From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:56847 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184AbdIOTsK (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:48:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 7so2067273pgd.13 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: iwlwifi firmware load broken in current -git To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Srinath Mannam , Bjorn Helgaas , Johannes Berg , Luca Coelho , "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , linuxwifi , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" References: <04c9b578-693c-1dc6-9f0f-904580231b21@kernel.dk> <1505232673.5400.243.camel@intel.com> <1505234187.5400.249.camel@coelho.fi> <4bcbcbc1-7c79-09f0-5071-bc2f53bf6574@kernel.dk> <1505246657.1974.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> <8de8d1e2-1673-e1ff-d0ac-6d3bb03e9e99@kernel.dk> <93bfbc9b-8829-66fa-f4d6-6d47124e460c@kernel.dk> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: (sfid-20170915_214814_990965_36645FF2) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:48:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/15/2017 01:38 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> >>> In any case, your patch introduces a regression on systems. Please get >>> it reverted now, and then you can come up with a new approach to fix the >>> double enable of the upstream bridge. >> >> Who's sending in the revert? I can certainly do it if no one else does, >> but it needs to be done. >> >> I'm not seeing any patches coming out of Srinath to fix up the >> situation, so we should revert the broken patch until a better solution >> exists. > > Hmm. I don't have the history here (apparently it never made lkml, for > example), so I don't even know which commit you're talking about. > > From some of the context it looks like commit 40f11adc7cd9 ("PCI: > Avoid race while enabling upstream bridges"), is that correct? Yes, Luca says that Bjorn already sent in the revert request, I just didn't see it since I wasn't CC'ed on it. So looks like we're all good, provided that makes it into -rc1. 40f11adc7cd9 is the broken commit. -- Jens Axboe