From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CEFC32796 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231846AbiHXKVI (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:21:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36978 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236785AbiHXKVH (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:21:07 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F4D2AF2; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 03:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C72820017; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:21:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1661336462; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EVcLun4IpqpMJcMOrdpcuGesg4d0g3/ryDpO2out2II=; b=npqIhVkPd3sSVkr7aEO4lt7byUjhng2m53nulc937QZ8HafVHG01yenCyng6Vo8MHvKaEU qAvkxaiQZZliPHn/ckWix77U5K1X0p2nPI2+rIf3fW/4MAQnVkBNzTwUA6WUmelE4hQFgu W2teHfriDqbNQrRHwekIv0bud/e+MWtRVo7bVpumlAKqrTQ/vKEMbHRBxsPzgn8C1Mgs+9 0D+CWPS5G58iM7gq+ZdOK/6JBlNkNFUUW1OIPPMoY6Y3VMmFbMhzyPLRAOEA+6ZHP+6NW5 i5iGyiAFNKPO7Cj77MXeZPmZJcw7XLyYCVGn1Y2Y6sJQqDKBZTJe/TtePAoSrw== Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:20:58 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Alexander Aring Cc: Alexander Aring , Stefan Schmidt , linux-wpan - ML , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Network Development , David Girault , Romuald Despres , Frederic Blain , Nicolas Schodet , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next 01/20] net: mac802154: Allow the creation of coordinator interfaces Message-ID: <20220824122058.1c46e09a@xps-13> In-Reply-To: References: <20220701143052.1267509-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20220701143052.1267509-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20220819191109.0e639918@xps-13> <20220823182950.1c722e13@xps-13> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexander, aahringo@redhat.com wrote on Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:44:52 -0400: > Hi, >=20 > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:29 PM Miquel Raynal > wrote: > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > aahringo@redhat.com wrote on Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:33:30 -0400: > > =20 > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:11 PM Miquel Raynal wrote: =20 > > > > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > > > aahringo@redhat.com wrote on Tue, 5 Jul 2022 21:51:02 -0400: > > > > =20 > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 10:36 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: =20 > > > > > > > > > > > > As a first strep in introducing proper PAN management and assoc= iation, > > > > > > we need to be able to create coordinator interfaces which might= act as > > > > > > coordinator or PAN coordinator. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, let's add the minimum support to allow the creation of t= hese > > > > > > interfaces. This might be restrained and improved later. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > > > > > > --- > > > > > > net/mac802154/iface.c | 14 ++++++++------ > > > > > > net/mac802154/rx.c | 2 +- > > > > > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/mac802154/iface.c b/net/mac802154/iface.c > > > > > > index 500ed1b81250..7ac0c5685d3f 100644 > > > > > > --- a/net/mac802154/iface.c > > > > > > +++ b/net/mac802154/iface.c > > > > > > @@ -273,13 +273,13 @@ ieee802154_check_concurrent_iface(struct = ieee802154_sub_if_data *sdata, > > > > > > if (nsdata !=3D sdata && ieee802154_sdata_runni= ng(nsdata)) { > > > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > - /* TODO currently we don't support mult= iple node types > > > > > > - * we need to run skb_clone at rx path.= Check if there > > > > > > - * exist really an use case if we need = to support > > > > > > - * multiple node types at the same time. > > > > > > + /* TODO currently we don't support mult= iple node/coord > > > > > > + * types we need to run skb_clone at rx= path. Check if > > > > > > + * there exist really an use case if we= need to support > > > > > > + * multiple node/coord types at the sam= e time. > > > > > > */ > > > > > > - if (wpan_dev->iftype =3D=3D NL802154_IF= TYPE_NODE && > > > > > > - nsdata->wpan_dev.iftype =3D=3D NL80= 2154_IFTYPE_NODE) > > > > > > + if (wpan_dev->iftype !=3D NL802154_IFTY= PE_MONITOR && > > > > > > + nsdata->wpan_dev.iftype !=3D NL8021= 54_IFTYPE_MONITOR) > > > > > > return -EBUSY; > > > > > > > > > > > > /* check all phy mac sublayer settings = are the same. > > > > > > @@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ ieee802154_setup_sdata(struct ieee802154_su= b_if_data *sdata, > > > > > > wpan_dev->short_addr =3D cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_ADDR_BR= OADCAST); > > > > > > > > > > > > switch (type) { > > > > > > + case NL802154_IFTYPE_COORD: > > > > > > case NL802154_IFTYPE_NODE: > > > > > > ieee802154_be64_to_le64(&wpan_dev->extended_add= r, > > > > > > sdata->dev->dev_addr); > > > > > > @@ -636,6 +637,7 @@ ieee802154_if_add(struct ieee802154_local *= local, const char *name, > > > > > > ieee802154_le64_to_be64(ndev->perm_addr, > > > > > > &local->hw.phy->perm_extended_a= ddr); > > > > > > switch (type) { > > > > > > + case NL802154_IFTYPE_COORD: > > > > > > case NL802154_IFTYPE_NODE: > > > > > > ndev->type =3D ARPHRD_IEEE802154; > > > > > > if (ieee802154_is_valid_extended_unicast_addr(e= xtended_addr)) { > > > > > > diff --git a/net/mac802154/rx.c b/net/mac802154/rx.c > > > > > > index b8ce84618a55..39459d8d787a 100644 > > > > > > --- a/net/mac802154/rx.c > > > > > > +++ b/net/mac802154/rx.c > > > > > > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ __ieee802154_rx_handle_packet(struct ieee80= 2154_local *local, > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list= ) { > > > > > > - if (sdata->wpan_dev.iftype !=3D NL802154_IFTYPE= _NODE) > > > > > > + if (sdata->wpan_dev.iftype =3D=3D NL802154_IFTY= PE_MONITOR) > > > > > > continue; =20 > > > > > > > > > > I probably get why you are doing that, but first the overall desi= gn is > > > > > working differently - means you should add an additional receive = path > > > > > for the special interface type. > > > > > > > > > > Also we "discovered" before that the receive path of node vs > > > > > coordinator is different... Where is the different handling here?= I > > > > > don't see it, I see that NODE and COORD are the same now (because= that > > > > > is _currently_ everything else than monitor). This change is not > > > > > enough and does "something" to handle in some way coordinator rec= eive > > > > > path but there are things missing. > > > > > > > > > > 1. Changing the address filters that it signals the transceiver i= t's > > > > > acting as coordinator > > > > > 2. We _should_ also have additional handling for whatever the > > > > > additional handling what address filters are doing in mac802154 > > > > > _because_ there is hardware which doesn't have address filtering = e.g. > > > > > hwsim which depend that this is working in software like other > > > > > transceiver hardware address filters. > > > > > > > > > > For the 2. one, I don't know if we do that even for NODE right or= we > > > > > just have the bare minimal support there... I don't assume that > > > > > everything is working correctly here but what I want to see is a > > > > > separate receive path for coordinators that people can send patch= es to > > > > > fix it. =20 > > > > > > > > Yes, we do very little differently between the two modes, that's wh= y I > > > > took the easy way: just changing the condition. I really don't see = what > > > > I can currently add here, but I am fine changing the style to easily > > > > show people where to add filters for such or such interface, but ri= ght > > > > now both path will look very "identical", do we agree on that? =20 > > > > > > mostly yes, but there exists a difference and we should at least check > > > if the node receive path violates the coordinator receive path and > > > vice versa. > > > Put it in a receive_path() function and then coord_receive_path(), > > > node_receive_path() that calls the receive_path() and do the > > > additional filtering for coordinators, etc. > > > > > > There should be a part in the standard about "third level filter rule > > > if it's a coordinator". > > > btw: this is because the address filter on the transceiver needs to > > > have the "i am a coordinator" boolean set which is missing in this > > > series. However it depends on the transceiver filtering level and the > > > mac802154 receive path if we actually need to run such filtering or > > > not. =20 > > > > I must be missing some information because I can't find any places > > where what you suggest is described in the spec. > > > > I agree there are multiple filtering level so let's go through them one > > by one (6.7.2 Reception and rejection): > > - first level: is the checksum (FCS) valid? > > yes -> goto second level > > no -> drop > > - second level: are we in promiscuous mode? > > yes -> forward to upper layers > > no -> goto second level (bis) > > - second level (bis): are we scanning? > > yes -> goto scan filtering > > no -> goto third level > > - scan filtering: is it a beacon? > > yes -> process the beacon > > no -> drop > > - third level: is the frame valid? (type, source, destination, pan id, > > etc) > > yes -> forward to upper layers > > no -> drop Actually right now the second level is not enforced, and all the filtering levels are a bit fuzzy and spread everywhere in rx.c. I'm gonna see if I can at least clarify all of that and only make coord-dependent the right section because right now a ieee802154_coord_rx() path in ieee802154_rx_handle_packet() does not really make sense given that the level 3 filtering rules are mostly enforced in ieee802154_subif_frame(). Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l