Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I tried to use BT 6LoWPAN and experienced a lot of races there, sadly
    > nobody is fixing it. I sent a RFC some years ago to tackle these
    > issues, also that the link-layer address is reconstructed by L3
    > address and not by a ndisc lookup is very weird. I don't know if this
    > is fixed or not.  However it was nothing related to the new BT mesh
    > stuff.

    >> for any BT device.  I would love to be wrong!!
    >>
    >> Running BTLE mesh is something I'd really like to do.
    >> My guess is that one could probably prototype this in userspace on top of
    >> bluez, and then use Alex' 6lowpan tap interface.

    > I did not do the "6lowpan tap" interface, the bluetooth people did
    > that and I complained about it and I never would accept this upstream.

okay, what did you use to connect the OpenThread native-build processes together?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [