From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan - ML <linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC wpan-next] atusb: add support for trac feature
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 19:10:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK-6q+jmuwxEDb9r-jmrZ+gZ5XXUkV1j22D0FBuxMzU5iJyUbw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220905161951.6d439994@xps-13>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:19 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> aahringo@redhat.com wrote on Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:16:42 -0400:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 11:22 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alexander,
> > >
> > > aahringo@redhat.com wrote on Sun, 4 Sep 2022 20:55:44 -0400:
> > >
> > > > This patch adds support for reading the trac register if atusb firmware
> > > > reports tx done. There is currently a feature to compare a sequence
> > > > number, if the payload is 1 it tells the driver only the sequence number
> > > > is available if it's two there is additional the trac status register as
> > > > payload.
> > > >
> > > > Currently the atusb_in_good() function determines if it's a tx done or
> > > > rx done if according the payload length. This patch is doing the same
> > > > and assumes this behaviour.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Just an RFC, need another weekend to test it.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/ieee802154/atusb.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/atusb.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/atusb.c
> > > > index 2c338783893d..95a4a3cdc8a4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/atusb.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/atusb.c
> > > > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void atusb_work_urbs(struct work_struct *work)
> > > >
> > > > /* ----- Asynchronous USB -------------------------------------------------- */
> > > >
> > > > -static void atusb_tx_done(struct atusb *atusb, u8 seq)
> > > > +static void atusb_tx_done(struct atusb *atusb, u8 seq, int reason)
> > > > {
> > > > struct usb_device *usb_dev = atusb->usb_dev;
> > > > u8 expect = atusb->tx_ack_seq;
> > > > @@ -199,7 +199,10 @@ static void atusb_tx_done(struct atusb *atusb, u8 seq)
> > > > dev_dbg(&usb_dev->dev, "%s (0x%02x/0x%02x)\n", __func__, seq, expect);
> > > > if (seq == expect) {
> > > > /* TODO check for ifs handling in firmware */
> > > > - ieee802154_xmit_complete(atusb->hw, atusb->tx_skb, false);
> > > > + if (reason == IEEE802154_SUCCESS)
> > > > + ieee802154_xmit_complete(atusb->hw, atusb->tx_skb, false);
> > > > + else
> > > > + ieee802154_xmit_error(atusb->hw, atusb->tx_skb, reason);
> > > > } else {
> > > > /* TODO I experience this case when atusb has a tx complete
> > > > * irq before probing, we should fix the firmware it's an
> > > > @@ -215,7 +218,8 @@ static void atusb_in_good(struct urb *urb)
> > > > struct usb_device *usb_dev = urb->dev;
> > > > struct sk_buff *skb = urb->context;
> > > > struct atusb *atusb = SKB_ATUSB(skb);
> > > > - u8 len, lqi;
> > > > + int result = IEEE802154_SUCCESS;
> > > > + u8 len, lqi, trac;
> > > >
> > > > if (!urb->actual_length) {
> > > > dev_dbg(&usb_dev->dev, "atusb_in: zero-sized URB ?\n");
> > > > @@ -224,8 +228,27 @@ static void atusb_in_good(struct urb *urb)
> > > >
> > > > len = *skb->data;
> > > >
> > > > - if (urb->actual_length == 1) {
> > > > - atusb_tx_done(atusb, len);
> > > > + switch (urb->actual_length) {
> > > > + case 2:
> > > > + trac = TRAC_MASK(*(skb->data + 1));
> > >
> > > I've been fighting all night thinking the issues were on the atusb side
> > > (it was horribly difficult to get the atusb toolchain up and running,
> > > I'll send a patch to update the instructions), in particular because of
> >
> > Really? for me it was just apt install avr-gcc libc-avr (or what the
> > debian packages name is).
>
> I feel so bad. All the instructions I could find (from 2011) advised to
> download an old gcc, an old binutils and old avr-lib, to compile
> everything by hand... 2 out of 3 archives returned a 404 error, the
> builds were chaotic I had to disable -Werror and fix many issues
> manually, then I had to fight with binutils assembler failing, I tried
> 4 different versions before I got it right... I did write a commit to
> update the instructions but if you say that just downloading the stock
> pre-compiled binaries worked I am a bit disappointed because the
> instructions specifically told not to do so.
>
I am sorry that you had those problems.
> > Then the dfu-util and be sure you invoke
> > dfu-util (as root because you might need some udev rules otherwise)
> > when the atusb is booting up.
>
> Yes, dfu worked right away, very nice tool.
>
> > > the data[2] definition which needed to be declared static outside of
> > > the functions (see the other mail) and, I guess, because of this
> > > beginner error: I was using skb->data[1] but of course it can't work.
> > >
> >
> > mhh, I am sorry. I am not sure if I understand what you mean? Does the
> > firmware patch have issues regarding data[2]?
>
> Actually I'm wrong.
> You did: *(skb->data + 1), which works.
> I did: skb->data[1], which does not.
> I thought that my mistake was related to data being a void *, but it's
> a char * so both should work. I don't know why it failed, maybe my
> attention level was too low and I missed something else.
I don't see a difference. No idea...
- Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-05 0:55 [RFC wpan-next] atusb: add support for trac feature Alexander Aring
2022-09-05 3:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-09-05 11:16 ` Alexander Aring
2022-09-05 14:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-09-05 23:10 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK-6q+jmuwxEDb9r-jmrZ+gZ5XXUkV1j22D0FBuxMzU5iJyUbw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).