linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: sandeen@sandeen.net, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 20:34:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <156774084974.2643257.15403943146639779829.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156774083707.2643257.15738851266613887341.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

When we're scanning the directory tree, we bump nr_dirs every time we
think we're going to queue a new directory to process, and we decrement
it every time we're finished doing something with a directory
(successful or not).  We forgot to undo a counter increment when
workqueue_add fails, so refactor the code into helpers and call them
as necessary for correct operation.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 scrub/vfs.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)


diff --git a/scrub/vfs.c b/scrub/vfs.c
index add4e815..f8bc98c0 100644
--- a/scrub/vfs.c
+++ b/scrub/vfs.c
@@ -45,6 +45,32 @@ struct scan_fs_tree_dir {
 
 static void scan_fs_dir(struct workqueue *wq, xfs_agnumber_t agno, void *arg);
 
+/* Increment the number of directories that are queued for processing. */
+static void
+inc_nr_dirs(
+	struct scan_fs_tree	*sft)
+{
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
+	sft->nr_dirs++;
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Decrement the number of directories that are queued for processing and if
+ * we ran out of dirs to process, wake up anyone who was waiting for processing
+ * to finish.
+ */
+static void
+dec_nr_dirs(
+	struct scan_fs_tree	*sft)
+{
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
+	sft->nr_dirs--;
+	if (sft->nr_dirs == 0)
+		pthread_cond_signal(&sft->wakeup);
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
+}
+
 /* Queue a directory for scanning. */
 static bool
 queue_subdir(
@@ -72,15 +98,10 @@ queue_subdir(
 	new_sftd->sft = sft;
 	new_sftd->rootdir = is_rootdir;
 
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
-	sft->nr_dirs++;
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
+	inc_nr_dirs(sft);
 	error = workqueue_add(wq, scan_fs_dir, 0, new_sftd);
 	if (error) {
-		/*
-		 * XXX: need to decrement nr_dirs here; will do that in the
-		 * next patch.
-		 */
+		dec_nr_dirs(sft);
 		str_info(ctx, ctx->mntpoint,
 _("Could not queue subdirectory scan work."));
 		goto out_path;
@@ -180,12 +201,7 @@ scan_fs_dir(
 		str_errno(ctx, sftd->path);
 
 out:
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&sft->lock);
-	sft->nr_dirs--;
-	if (sft->nr_dirs == 0)
-		pthread_cond_signal(&sft->wakeup);
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sft->lock);
-
+	dec_nr_dirs(sft);
 	free(sftd->path);
 	free(sftd);
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-06  3:33 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-06  3:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs_scrub: refactor queueing of subdir scan work item Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-10  1:04   ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-06  3:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-09-06  3:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs_scrub: remove unnecessary wakeup wait in scan_fs_tree Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-25 21:31 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-25 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-26 21:21 [PATCH 0/3] xfs_scrub: fix bugs in vfs tree walk code Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-26 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub: fix nr_dirs accounting problems Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-04  8:15   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=156774084974.2643257.15403943146639779829.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).