[PATCH v5 0/3] xfs: random fixes for disk quota

[PATCH v5 0/3] xfs: random fixes for disk quota

[xiakaixu1987]

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>

Hi all,

This patchset include random fixes and code cleanups for disk quota.
In order to make it easier to track, I bundle them up and put all
the scattered patches into a single patchset.

Changes for v5:
 -drop the check for delta != 0 in xfs_trans_dqresv().

Changes for v4:
 -delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check and allocation in one
  patch.
 -drop the first two patches that have been applied.

Changes for v3:
 -add a separate patch to delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check
  and allocation.

Changes for v2: 
 -add the ASSERT for the arguments O_{u,g,p}dqpp.
 -fix the strange indent.
 -remove the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag.
 -add more commit log description for delta judgement.

Kaixu Xia (3):
  xfs: delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check and allocation
  xfs: check tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag
  xfs: directly return if the delta equal to zero

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h |  1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c         |  8 +------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c   | 46 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.0

[PATCH v5 1/3] xfs: delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check and allocation

[xiakaixu1987]

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>

The function xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino() wrap around xfs_trans_mod_dquot()
to account for quotas, and also there is the function call chain
xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots -> xfs_trans_dqresv -> xfs_trans_mod_dquot,
both of them do the duplicated null check and allocation. Thus
we can delete the duplicated operation from them.

Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
index fe45b0c3970c..67f1e275b34d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
@@ -143,9 +143,6 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino(
 	    xfs_is_quota_inode(&mp->m_sb, ip->i_ino))
 		return;
 
-	if (tp->t_dqinfo == NULL)
-		xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(tp);
-
 	if (XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp) && ip->i_udquot)
 		(void) xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, ip->i_udquot, field, delta);
 	if (XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp) && ip->i_gdquot)
@@ -698,7 +695,6 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
 	 * because we don't have the luxury of a transaction envelope then.
 	 */
 	if (tp) {
-		ASSERT(tp->t_dqinfo);
 		ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK);
 		if (nblks != 0)
 			xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
@@ -752,9 +748,6 @@ xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(
 	if (!XFS_IS_QUOTA_RUNNING(mp) || !XFS_IS_QUOTA_ON(mp))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (tp && tp->t_dqinfo == NULL)
-		xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(tp);
-
 	ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK);
 
 	if (udqp) {
-- 
2.20.0

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] xfs: delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check and allocation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:54:19AM +0800, xiakaixu1987@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
> 
> The function xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino() wrap around xfs_trans_mod_dquot()

s/wrap/wraps/

Also this line is too long for commit messages.

>
> to account for quotas, and also there is the function call chain
> xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots -> xfs_trans_dqresv -> xfs_trans_mod_dquot,

This one as well.

Otherwise this looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] xfs: delete duplicated tp->t_dqinfo null check and allocation

[kaixuxia]

On 2020/10/15 16:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:54:19AM +0800, xiakaixu1987@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
>>
>> The function xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino() wrap around xfs_trans_mod_dquot()
> 
> s/wrap/wraps/
> 
> Also this line is too long for commit messages.
> 
>>
>> to account for quotas, and also there is the function call chain
>> xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots -> xfs_trans_dqresv -> xfs_trans_mod_dquot,
> 
> This one as well.

Yeah, I'll fix them in the next version.

Thanks,
Kaixu
> 
> Otherwise this looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 

-- 
kaixuxia

[PATCH v5 2/3] xfs: check tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag

[xiakaixu1987]

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>

Nowadays the only things that the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag seems to do
are indicates the tp->t_dqinfo->dqs[XFS_QM_TRANS_{USR,GRP,PRJ}] values
changed and check in xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas() and the unreserve
variant xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_dquots(). Actually, we also can
use the tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag, that
is to say, we allocate the new tp->t_dqinfo only when the qtrx values
changed, so the tp->t_dqinfo value isn't NULL equals the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY
flag is set, we only need to check if tp->t_dqinfo == NULL in
xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas() and its unreserve variant to determine
whether lock all of the dquots and join them to the transaction.

Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h |  1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c         |  8 +-------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c   | 13 ++-----------
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h
index c795ae47b3c9..8c61a461bf7b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ void	xfs_log_get_max_trans_res(struct xfs_mount *mp,
 #define	XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY	0x02	/* superblock is modified */
 #define	XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES	0x04	/* xact took a permanent log res */
 #define	XFS_TRANS_SYNC		0x08	/* make commit synchronous */
-#define XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY	0x10	/* at least one dquot in trx dirty */
 #define XFS_TRANS_RESERVE	0x20    /* OK to use reserved data blocks */
 #define XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT 0x40	/* do not elevate SB writecount */
 #define XFS_TRANS_RES_FDBLKS	0x80	/* reserve newly freed blocks */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 2bfbcf28b1bd..4d2cebaa3637 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -959,7 +959,6 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc(
 	xfs_buf_t	*ialloc_context = NULL;
 	int		code;
 	void		*dqinfo;
-	uint		tflags;
 
 	tp = *tpp;
 	ASSERT(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES);
@@ -1018,12 +1017,9 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc(
 		 * and attach it to the next transaction.
 		 */
 		dqinfo = NULL;
-		tflags = 0;
 		if (tp->t_dqinfo) {
 			dqinfo = (void *)tp->t_dqinfo;
 			tp->t_dqinfo = NULL;
-			tflags = tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY;
-			tp->t_flags &= ~(XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY);
 		}
 
 		code = xfs_trans_roll(&tp);
@@ -1031,10 +1027,8 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc(
 		/*
 		 * Re-attach the quota info that we detached from prev trx.
 		 */
-		if (dqinfo) {
+		if (dqinfo)
 			tp->t_dqinfo = dqinfo;
-			tp->t_flags |= tflags;
-		}
 
 		if (code) {
 			xfs_buf_relse(ialloc_context);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
index 67f1e275b34d..0ebfd7930382 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
@@ -84,13 +84,6 @@ xfs_trans_dup_dqinfo(
 
 	xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(ntp);
 
-	/*
-	 * Because the quota blk reservation is carried forward,
-	 * it is also necessary to carry forward the DQ_DIRTY flag.
-	 */
-	if (otp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY)
-		ntp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY;
-
 	for (j = 0; j < XFS_QM_TRANS_DQTYPES; j++) {
 		oqa = otp->t_dqinfo->dqs[j];
 		nqa = ntp->t_dqinfo->dqs[j];
@@ -270,8 +263,6 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
 
 	if (delta)
 		trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_after(qtrx);
-
-	tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY;
 }
 
 
@@ -348,7 +339,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas(
 	int64_t			totalbdelta;
 	int64_t			totalrtbdelta;
 
-	if (!(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY))
+	if (!tp->t_dqinfo)
 		return;
 
 	ASSERT(tp->t_dqinfo);
@@ -490,7 +481,7 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_dquots(
 	struct xfs_dqtrx	*qtrx, *qa;
 	bool			locked;
 
-	if (!tp->t_dqinfo || !(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY))
+	if (!tp->t_dqinfo)
 		return;
 
 	for (j = 0; j < XFS_QM_TRANS_DQTYPES; j++) {
-- 
2.20.0

Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] xfs: check tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag

[Christoph Hellwig]

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

[PATCH v5 3/3] xfs: directly return if the delta equal to zero

[xiakaixu1987]

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>

The xfs_trans_mod_dquot() function will allocate new tp->t_dqinfo if it is
NULL and make the changes in the tp->t_dqinfo->dqs[XFS_QM_TRANS_{USR,GRP,PRJ}].
Nowadays seems none of the callers want to join the dquots to the
transaction and push them to device when the delta is zero. Actually,
most of time the caller would check the delta and go on only when the
delta value is not zero, so we should bail out when it is zero.

Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
index 0ebfd7930382..6e243e8b30ec 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
@@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
 	ASSERT(XFS_IS_QUOTA_RUNNING(tp->t_mountp));
 	qtrx = NULL;
 
+	if (!delta)
+		return;
+
 	if (tp->t_dqinfo == NULL)
 		xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(tp);
 	/*
@@ -205,10 +208,8 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
 	if (qtrx->qt_dquot == NULL)
 		qtrx->qt_dquot = dqp;
 
-	if (delta) {
-		trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_before(qtrx);
-		trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp, field, delta);
-	}
+	trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_before(qtrx);
+	trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp, field, delta);
 
 	switch (field) {
 	/* regular disk blk reservation */
@@ -261,8 +262,7 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
 		ASSERT(0);
 	}
 
-	if (delta)
-		trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_after(qtrx);
+	trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_after(qtrx);
 }
 
 
@@ -687,14 +687,12 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
 	 */
 	if (tp) {
 		ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK);
-		if (nblks != 0)
-			xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
-					    flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK,
-					    nblks);
-		if (ninos != 0)
-			xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
-					    XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_INOS,
-					    ninos);
+		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
+				    flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK,
+				    nblks);
+		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
+				    XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_INOS,
+				    ninos);
 	}
 	ASSERT(dqp->q_blk.reserved >= dqp->q_blk.count);
 	ASSERT(dqp->q_rtb.reserved >= dqp->q_rtb.count);
-- 
2.20.0

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] xfs: directly return if the delta equal to zero

[Christoph Hellwig]

> +		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
> +				    flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK,
> +				    nblks);
> +		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp,
> +				    XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_INOS,
> +				    ninos);

This can be shortened to:

		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp, flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK,
				    nblk);
		xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp, XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_INOS, ninos);

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>