From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 17:11:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160704431272.734470.4579974752157438262.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160704429410.734470.15640089119078502938.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
When we recover a rmap intent from the log, we need to validate its
contents before we try to replay them. Hoist the checking code into a
separate function in preparation to refactor this code to use validation
helpers.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c
index 7adc996ca6e3..d77d104d93c6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c
@@ -460,6 +460,42 @@ const struct xfs_defer_op_type xfs_rmap_update_defer_type = {
.cancel_item = xfs_rmap_update_cancel_item,
};
+/* Is this recovered RUI ok? */
+static inline bool
+xfs_rui_validate_map(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp,
+ struct xfs_map_extent *rmap)
+{
+ xfs_fsblock_t startblock_fsb;
+ bool op_ok;
+
+ startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
+ XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, rmap->me_startblock));
+ switch (rmap->me_flags & XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK) {
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_MAP:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_MAP_SHARED:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_UNMAP:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_UNMAP_SHARED:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_CONVERT:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_CONVERT_SHARED:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_ALLOC:
+ case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_FREE:
+ op_ok = true;
+ break;
+ default:
+ op_ok = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!op_ok || startblock_fsb == 0 ||
+ rmap->me_len == 0 ||
+ startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
+ rmap->me_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
+ (rmap->me_flags & ~XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_FLAGS))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Process an rmap update intent item that was recovered from the log.
* We need to update the rmapbt.
@@ -475,10 +511,8 @@ xfs_rui_item_recover(
struct xfs_trans *tp;
struct xfs_btree_cur *rcur = NULL;
struct xfs_mount *mp = lip->li_mountp;
- xfs_fsblock_t startblock_fsb;
enum xfs_rmap_intent_type type;
xfs_exntst_t state;
- bool op_ok;
int i;
int whichfork;
int error = 0;
@@ -489,30 +523,11 @@ xfs_rui_item_recover(
* just toss the RUI.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ruip->rui_format.rui_nextents; i++) {
- rmap = &ruip->rui_format.rui_extents[i];
- startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
- XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, rmap->me_startblock));
- switch (rmap->me_flags & XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK) {
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_MAP:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_MAP_SHARED:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_UNMAP:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_UNMAP_SHARED:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_CONVERT:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_CONVERT_SHARED:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_ALLOC:
- case XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_FREE:
- op_ok = true;
- break;
- default:
- op_ok = false;
- break;
- }
- if (!op_ok || startblock_fsb == 0 ||
- rmap->me_len == 0 ||
- startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
- rmap->me_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
- (rmap->me_flags & ~XFS_RMAP_EXTENT_FLAGS))
+ if (!xfs_rui_validate_map(mp,
+ &ruip->rui_format.rui_extents[i])) {
+ XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ }
}
error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-04 1:11 [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 1:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: hoist recovered bmap intent checks out of xfs_bui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:55 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered bmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:56 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 19:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 1:11 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-12-04 13:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered rmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:59 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered refcount intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: hoist recovered extent-free intent checks out of xfs_efi_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered extent-free intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: validate feature support when recovering rmap/refcount/bmap intents Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-06 23:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 14:02 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-07 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 1:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: trace log intent item recovery failures Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 19:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-06 23:09 [PATCH v3 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 3:37 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 3:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160704431272.734470.4579974752157438262.stgit@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).