linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] xfs: hoist recovered bmap intent checks out of xfs_bui_item_recover
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:09:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160729618914.1607103.8947054397136451871.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160729618252.1607103.863261260798043728.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

When we recover a bmap intent from the log, we need to validate its
contents before we try to replay them.  Hoist the checking code into a
separate function in preparation to refactor this code to use validation
helpers.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
index 9e16a4d0f97c..9be61feca65b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
@@ -417,6 +417,49 @@ const struct xfs_defer_op_type xfs_bmap_update_defer_type = {
 	.cancel_item	= xfs_bmap_update_cancel_item,
 };
 
+/* Is this recovered BUI ok? */
+static inline bool
+xfs_bui_validate(
+	struct xfs_mount		*mp,
+	struct xfs_bui_log_item		*buip)
+{
+	struct xfs_map_extent		*bmap;
+	xfs_fsblock_t			startblock_fsb;
+	xfs_fsblock_t			inode_fsb;
+
+	/* Only one mapping operation per BUI... */
+	if (buip->bui_format.bui_nextents != XFS_BUI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS)
+		return false;
+
+	bmap = &buip->bui_format.bui_extents[0];
+	startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
+			XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, bmap->me_startblock));
+	inode_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp,
+			XFS_INO_TO_FSB(mp, bmap->me_owner)));
+
+	if (bmap->me_flags & ~XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_FLAGS)
+		return false;
+
+	switch (bmap->me_flags & XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK) {
+	case XFS_BMAP_MAP:
+	case XFS_BMAP_UNMAP:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (startblock_fsb == 0 ||
+	    bmap->me_len == 0 ||
+	    inode_fsb == 0 ||
+	    startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
+	    bmap->me_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
+	    inode_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
+	    (bmap->me_flags & ~XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_FLAGS))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a bmap update intent item that was recovered from the log.
  * We need to update some inode's bmbt.
@@ -433,47 +476,24 @@ xfs_bui_item_recover(
 	struct xfs_mount		*mp = lip->li_mountp;
 	struct xfs_map_extent		*bmap;
 	struct xfs_bud_log_item		*budp;
-	xfs_fsblock_t			startblock_fsb;
-	xfs_fsblock_t			inode_fsb;
 	xfs_filblks_t			count;
 	xfs_exntst_t			state;
 	unsigned int			bui_type;
 	int				whichfork;
 	int				error = 0;
 
-	/* Only one mapping operation per BUI... */
-	if (buip->bui_format.bui_nextents != XFS_BUI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS)
+	if (!xfs_bui_validate(mp, buip)) {
+		XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp,
+				&buip->bui_format, sizeof(buip->bui_format));
 		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+	}
 
-	/*
-	 * First check the validity of the extent described by the
-	 * BUI.  If anything is bad, then toss the BUI.
-	 */
 	bmap = &buip->bui_format.bui_extents[0];
-	startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
-			   XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, bmap->me_startblock));
-	inode_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp,
-			XFS_INO_TO_FSB(mp, bmap->me_owner)));
 	state = (bmap->me_flags & XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN) ?
 			XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN : XFS_EXT_NORM;
 	whichfork = (bmap->me_flags & XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_ATTR_FORK) ?
 			XFS_ATTR_FORK : XFS_DATA_FORK;
 	bui_type = bmap->me_flags & XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK;
-	switch (bui_type) {
-	case XFS_BMAP_MAP:
-	case XFS_BMAP_UNMAP:
-		break;
-	default:
-		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
-	}
-	if (startblock_fsb == 0 ||
-	    bmap->me_len == 0 ||
-	    inode_fsb == 0 ||
-	    startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
-	    bmap->me_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
-	    inode_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
-	    (bmap->me_flags & ~XFS_BMAP_EXTENT_FLAGS))
-		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 
 	/* Grab the inode. */
 	error = xfs_iget(mp, NULL, bmap->me_owner, 0, 0, &ip);


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-06 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 23:09 [PATCH v3 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:09 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered bmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered rmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered refcount intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: hoist recovered extent-free intent checks out of xfs_efi_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered extent-free intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: validate feature support when recovering rmap/refcount/bmap intents Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 18:26   ` [PATCH v3.1 09/10] xfs: validate feature support when recovering rmap/refcount intents Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 18:30     ` Brian Foster
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: trace log intent item recovery failures Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 17:28   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-07 18:27     ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-04  1:11 [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04  1:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: hoist recovered bmap intent checks out of xfs_bui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:55   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-01  3:37 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01  3:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: hoist recovered bmap intent checks out of xfs_bui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 10:02   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160729618914.1607103.8947054397136451871.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).