From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
david@fromorbit.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: relocate the eofb/cowb workqueue functions
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:53:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161142800757.2173480.5105909989904915251.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161142800187.2173480.17415824680111946713.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Move the xfs_{eof,cow}blocks_worker and xfs_queue_{eof,cow}blocks
functions further down in the file so that the cleanups in the next
patches won't have to pre-declare static functions. No functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 0d228a5e879f..5dda039b1433 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -915,69 +915,6 @@ xfs_inode_walk(
return last_error;
}
-/*
- * Background scanning to trim post-EOF preallocated space. This is queued
- * based on the 'speculative_prealloc_lifetime' tunable (5m by default).
- */
-void
-xfs_queue_eofblocks(
- struct xfs_mount *mp)
-{
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_EOFBLOCKS_TAG))
- queue_delayed_work(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue,
- &mp->m_eofblocks_work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_eofb_secs * 1000));
- rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-void
-xfs_eofblocks_worker(
- struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
- struct xfs_mount, m_eofblocks_work);
-
- if (!sb_start_write_trylock(mp->m_super))
- return;
- xfs_icache_free_eofblocks(mp, NULL);
- sb_end_write(mp->m_super);
-
- xfs_queue_eofblocks(mp);
-}
-
-/*
- * Background scanning to trim preallocated CoW space. This is queued
- * based on the 'speculative_cow_prealloc_lifetime' tunable (5m by default).
- * (We'll just piggyback on the post-EOF prealloc space workqueue.)
- */
-void
-xfs_queue_cowblocks(
- struct xfs_mount *mp)
-{
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_COWBLOCKS_TAG))
- queue_delayed_work(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue,
- &mp->m_cowblocks_work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_cowb_secs * 1000));
- rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-void
-xfs_cowblocks_worker(
- struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
- struct xfs_mount, m_cowblocks_work);
-
- if (!sb_start_write_trylock(mp->m_super))
- return;
- xfs_icache_free_cowblocks(mp, NULL);
- sb_end_write(mp->m_super);
-
- xfs_queue_cowblocks(mp);
-}
-
/*
* Grab the inode for reclaim exclusively.
*
@@ -1396,6 +1333,37 @@ xfs_icache_free_eofblocks(
XFS_ICI_EOFBLOCKS_TAG);
}
+/*
+ * Background scanning to trim post-EOF preallocated space. This is queued
+ * based on the 'speculative_prealloc_lifetime' tunable (5m by default).
+ */
+void
+xfs_queue_eofblocks(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_EOFBLOCKS_TAG))
+ queue_delayed_work(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue,
+ &mp->m_eofblocks_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_eofb_secs * 1000));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+void
+xfs_eofblocks_worker(
+ struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+ struct xfs_mount, m_eofblocks_work);
+
+ if (!sb_start_write_trylock(mp->m_super))
+ return;
+ xfs_icache_free_eofblocks(mp, NULL);
+ sb_end_write(mp->m_super);
+
+ xfs_queue_eofblocks(mp);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long
xfs_iflag_for_tag(
int tag)
@@ -1608,6 +1576,38 @@ xfs_icache_free_cowblocks(
XFS_ICI_COWBLOCKS_TAG);
}
+/*
+ * Background scanning to trim preallocated CoW space. This is queued
+ * based on the 'speculative_cow_prealloc_lifetime' tunable (5m by default).
+ * (We'll just piggyback on the post-EOF prealloc space workqueue.)
+ */
+void
+xfs_queue_cowblocks(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_COWBLOCKS_TAG))
+ queue_delayed_work(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue,
+ &mp->m_cowblocks_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_cowb_secs * 1000));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+void
+xfs_cowblocks_worker(
+ struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+ struct xfs_mount, m_cowblocks_work);
+
+ if (!sb_start_write_trylock(mp->m_super))
+ return;
+ xfs_icache_free_cowblocks(mp, NULL);
+ sb_end_write(mp->m_super);
+
+ xfs_queue_cowblocks(mp);
+}
+
void
xfs_inode_set_cowblocks_tag(
xfs_inode_t *ip)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-23 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-23 18:53 [PATCHSET v4 0/9] xfs: consolidate posteof and cowblocks cleanup Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:53 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-01-23 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: hide xfs_icache_free_eofblocks Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: hide xfs_icache_free_cowblocks Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: remove trivial eof/cowblocks functions Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: consolidate incore inode radix tree posteof/cowblocks tags Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: consolidate the eofblocks and cowblocks workers Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: only walk the incore inode tree once per blockgc scan Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: rename block gc start and stop functions Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-23 18:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: parallelize block preallocation garbage collection Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-26 5:12 ` [PATCH v4.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-26 5:13 ` [PATCH 10/9] xfs: expose the blockgc workqueue knobs publicly Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-27 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161142800757.2173480.5105909989904915251.stgit@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).