From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] xfs: move xfs_inactive call to xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <162758423915.332903.12021883694187724326.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162758423315.332903.16799817941903734904.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Move the xfs_inactive call and all the other debugging checks and stats
updates into xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable because most of that are
implementation details about the inode cache. This is preparation for
deferred inactivation that is coming up.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 50 --------------------------------------------------
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 086a88b8dfdb..7bc2690da87d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -292,6 +292,32 @@ xfs_perag_clear_inode_tag(
trace_xfs_perag_clear_inode_tag(mp, pag->pag_agno, tag, _RET_IP_);
}
+#ifdef DEBUG
+static void
+xfs_check_delalloc(
+ struct xfs_inode *ip,
+ int whichfork)
+{
+ struct xfs_ifork *ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec got;
+ struct xfs_iext_cursor icur;
+
+ if (!ifp || !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ifp, 0, &icur, &got))
+ return;
+ do {
+ if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock)) {
+ xfs_warn(ip->i_mount,
+ "ino %llx %s fork has delalloc extent at [0x%llx:0x%llx]",
+ ip->i_ino,
+ whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK ? "data" : "cow",
+ got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
+ }
+ } while (xfs_iext_next_extent(ifp, &icur, &got));
+}
+#else
+#define xfs_check_delalloc(ip, whichfork) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
/*
* We set the inode flag atomically with the radix tree tag.
* Once we get tag lookups on the radix tree, this inode flag
@@ -304,6 +330,29 @@ xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable(
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
struct xfs_perag *pag;
+ xfs_inactive(ip);
+
+ if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp) && ip->i_delayed_blks) {
+ xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+ xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_COW_FORK);
+ ASSERT(0);
+ }
+
+ XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_reclaim);
+
+ /*
+ * We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
+ */
+ ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
+ ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
+
+ /*
+ * We always use background reclaim here because even if the inode is
+ * clean, it still may be under IO and hence we have wait for IO
+ * completion to occur before we can reclaim the inode. The background
+ * reclaim path handles this more efficiently than we can here, so
+ * simply let background reclaim tear down all inodes.
+ */
pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 36fc81e52dc2..ef89a9a3ba9e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -591,32 +591,6 @@ xfs_fs_alloc_inode(
return NULL;
}
-#ifdef DEBUG
-static void
-xfs_check_delalloc(
- struct xfs_inode *ip,
- int whichfork)
-{
- struct xfs_ifork *ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
- struct xfs_bmbt_irec got;
- struct xfs_iext_cursor icur;
-
- if (!ifp || !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ifp, 0, &icur, &got))
- return;
- do {
- if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock)) {
- xfs_warn(ip->i_mount,
- "ino %llx %s fork has delalloc extent at [0x%llx:0x%llx]",
- ip->i_ino,
- whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK ? "data" : "cow",
- got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
- }
- } while (xfs_iext_next_extent(ifp, &icur, &got));
-}
-#else
-#define xfs_check_delalloc(ip, whichfork) do { } while (0)
-#endif
-
/*
* Now that the generic code is guaranteed not to be accessing
* the linux inode, we can inactivate and reclaim the inode.
@@ -632,30 +606,6 @@ xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_rwsem));
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_rele);
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_remove);
-
- xfs_inactive(ip);
-
- if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) && ip->i_delayed_blks) {
- xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
- xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_COW_FORK);
- ASSERT(0);
- }
-
- XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_reclaim);
-
- /*
- * We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
- */
- ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
- ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
-
- /*
- * We always use background reclaim here because even if the inode is
- * clean, it still may be under IO and hence we have wait for IO
- * completion to occur before we can reclaim the inode. The background
- * reclaim path handles this more efficiently than we can here, so
- * simply let background reclaim tear down all inodes.
- */
xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable(ip);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 18:43 [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 02/20] xfs: detach dquots from inode if we don't need to inactivate it Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/20] xfs: defer inode inactivation to a workqueue Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-30 4:24 ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-31 4:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-01 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-01 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-03 8:34 ` [PATCH, alternative] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-03 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 3:20 ` [PATCH, alternative v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 10:03 ` [PATCH] xfs: inodegc needs to stop before freeze Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 12:37 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 10:46 ` [PATCH] xfs: don't run inodegc flushes when inodegc is not active Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 11:09 ` [PATCH, alternative v2] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 15:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:35 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:49 ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #1] xfs: introduce CPU hotplug infrastructure Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:50 ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #2] xfs: introduce all-mounts list for cpu hotplug notifications Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:52 ` [PATCH, post-03/20 1/1] xfs: hook up inodegc to CPU dead notification Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:48 ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/20] xfs: throttle inode inactivation queuing on memory reclaim Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/20] xfs: don't throttle memory reclaim trying to queue inactive inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/20] xfs: throttle inodegc queuing on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02 1:30 ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately when memory is tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/20] xfs: expose sysfs knob to control inode inactivation delay Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 09/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when free space is tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when quota are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 11/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when realtime extents " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 12/20] xfs: inactivate inodes any time we try to free speculative preallocations Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 13/20] xfs: flush inode inactivation work when compiling usage statistics Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 14/20] xfs: parallelize inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02 0:55 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02 21:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 15/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when AG free space are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 16/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 17/20] xfs: don't run speculative preallocation gc when fs is frozen Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 18/20] xfs: scale speculative preallocation gc delay based on free space Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 19/20] xfs: use background worker pool when transactions can't get " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 20/20] xfs: avoid buffer deadlocks when walking fs inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02 10:35 ` [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=162758423915.332903.12021883694187724326.stgit@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).