linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: online checking of the free rt extent count
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:20:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166473480575.1083794.6363015906526063261.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166473480544.1083794.8963547317476704789.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Teach the summary count checker to count the number of free realtime
extents and compare that to the superblock copy.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c |   86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h      |    8 ----
 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
index c869b537fe34..2eea6a517b79 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 #include "xfs_health.h"
 #include "xfs_btree.h"
 #include "xfs_ag.h"
+#include "xfs_rtalloc.h"
+#include "xfs_inode.h"
 #include "scrub/scrub.h"
 #include "scrub/common.h"
 #include "scrub/trace.h"
@@ -43,6 +45,16 @@
  * our tolerance for mismatch between expected and actual counter values.
  */
 
+struct xchk_fscounters {
+	struct xfs_scrub	*sc;
+	uint64_t		icount;
+	uint64_t		ifree;
+	uint64_t		fdblocks;
+	uint64_t		frextents;
+	unsigned long long	icount_min;
+	unsigned long long	icount_max;
+};
+
 /*
  * Since the expected value computation is lockless but only browses incore
  * values, the percpu counters should be fairly close to each other.  However,
@@ -127,6 +139,7 @@ xchk_setup_fscounters(
 	if (!sc->buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	fsc = sc->buf;
+	fsc->sc = sc;
 
 	xfs_icount_range(sc->mp, &fsc->icount_min, &fsc->icount_max);
 
@@ -288,6 +301,59 @@ xchk_fscount_aggregate_agcounts(
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_RT
+static inline int
+xchk_fscount_add_frextent(
+	struct xfs_mount		*mp,
+	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
+	const struct xfs_rtalloc_rec	*rec,
+	void				*priv)
+{
+	struct xchk_fscounters		*fsc = priv;
+	int				error = 0;
+
+	fsc->frextents += rec->ar_extcount;
+
+	xchk_should_terminate(fsc->sc, &error);
+	return error;
+}
+
+/* Calculate the number of free realtime extents from the realtime bitmap. */
+STATIC int
+xchk_fscount_count_frextents(
+	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
+	struct xchk_fscounters	*fsc)
+{
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = sc->mp;
+	int			error;
+
+	fsc->frextents = 0;
+	if (!xfs_has_realtime(mp))
+		return 0;
+
+	xfs_ilock(sc->mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP);
+	error = xfs_rtalloc_query_all(sc->mp, sc->tp,
+			xchk_fscount_add_frextent, fsc);
+	if (error) {
+		xchk_set_incomplete(sc);
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+out_unlock:
+	xfs_iunlock(sc->mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP);
+	return error;
+}
+#else
+STATIC int
+xchk_fscount_count_frextents(
+	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
+	struct xchk_fscounters	*fsc)
+{
+	fsc->frextents = 0;
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_XFS_RT */
+
 /*
  * Part 2: Comparing filesystem summary counters.  All we have to do here is
  * sum the percpu counters and compare them to what we've observed.
@@ -359,16 +425,17 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = sc->mp;
 	struct xchk_fscounters	*fsc = sc->buf;
-	int64_t			icount, ifree, fdblocks;
+	int64_t			icount, ifree, fdblocks, frextents;
 	int			error;
 
 	/* Snapshot the percpu counters. */
 	icount = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount);
 	ifree = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree);
 	fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks);
+	frextents = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_frextents);
 
 	/* No negative values, please! */
-	if (icount < 0 || ifree < 0 || fdblocks < 0)
+	if (icount < 0 || ifree < 0 || fdblocks < 0 || frextents < 0)
 		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
 
 	/* See if icount is obviously wrong. */
@@ -379,6 +446,10 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 	if (fdblocks > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
 		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
 
+	/* See if frextents is obviously wrong. */
+	if (frextents > mp->m_sb.sb_rextents)
+		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
+
 	/*
 	 * If ifree exceeds icount by more than the minimum variance then
 	 * something's probably wrong with the counters.
@@ -393,6 +464,13 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 	if (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_INCOMPLETE)
 		return 0;
 
+	/* Count the free extents counter for rt volumes. */
+	error = xchk_fscount_count_frextents(sc, fsc);
+	if (!xchk_process_error(sc, 0, XFS_SB_BLOCK(mp), &error))
+		return error;
+	if (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_INCOMPLETE)
+		return 0;
+
 	/* Compare the in-core counters with whatever we counted. */
 	if (!xchk_fscount_within_range(sc, icount, &mp->m_icount, fsc->icount))
 		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
@@ -404,5 +482,9 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 			fsc->fdblocks))
 		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
 
+	if (!xchk_fscount_within_range(sc, frextents, &mp->m_frextents,
+			fsc->frextents))
+		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
+
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h
index 92b383061e88..85c055c2ddc5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h
@@ -173,12 +173,4 @@ void xchk_xref_is_used_rt_space(struct xfs_scrub *sc, xfs_rtblock_t rtbno,
 # define xchk_xref_is_used_rt_space(sc, rtbno, len) do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
-struct xchk_fscounters {
-	uint64_t		icount;
-	uint64_t		ifree;
-	uint64_t		fdblocks;
-	unsigned long long	icount_min;
-	unsigned long long	icount_max;
-};
-
 #endif	/* __XFS_SCRUB_SCRUB_H__ */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-02 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-02 18:20 [PATCHSET v23.1 0/2] xfs: enhance fs summary counter scrubber Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-02 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: skip fscounters comparisons when the scan is incomplete Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-14  3:51   ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-02 18:20 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-10-14  3:56   ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: online checking of the free rt extent count Dave Chinner
2022-10-14 21:46     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=166473480575.1083794.6363015906526063261.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).