From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [4.8 hang] xfstests generic/361 hangs on dax enabled filesystems
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:37:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803223713.GA22364@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803171127.GA15876@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:11:27AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:33:54AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Just hit a reproducable hang in generic/361. Essentially this on
> > a 8GB pmem device:
> >
> > mkfs.xfs -f /dev/pmem1
> > mount -o dax /dev/pmem1 /mnt/scratch
> > xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1g" test.img
> > losetup -f --show /mnt/scratch/test.img
> > mkfs.xfs -f /dev/loop0
> >
> > And the mkfs.xfs command hangs with a discard that never completes:
> >
> > [ 243.413918] INFO: task mkfs.xfs:5708 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [ 243.415678] Not tainted 4.7.0-dgc+ #862
> > [ 243.416772] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [ 243.418769] mkfs.xfs D ffff880835143c18 13848 5708 5441 0x00000000
> > [ 243.420620] ffff880835143c18 ffff880835143c20 ffff88083a244780 ffff8808358ba3c0
> > [ 243.422636] ffff88023aa20000 ffff880835144000 7fffffffffffffff 7fffffffffffffff
> > [ 243.424586] ffff8808358ba3c0 00000000024000c0 ffff880835143c30 ffffffff81e5e38c
> > [ 243.426466] Call Trace:
> > [ 243.427050] [<ffffffff81e5e38c>] schedule+0x3c/0x90
> > [ 243.428224] [<ffffffff81e62be5>] schedule_timeout+0x265/0x330
> > [ 243.429563] [<ffffffff8109f125>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x25/0x40
> > [ 243.430896] [<ffffffff8109f149>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10
> > [ 243.432360] [<ffffffff81125edc>] ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xb0
> > [ 243.433556] [<ffffffff81e5db54>] io_schedule_timeout+0xa4/0x110
> > [ 243.434932] [<ffffffff81e5eed6>] wait_for_completion_io+0xd6/0x110
> > [ 243.436297] [<ffffffff810decd0>] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
> > [ 243.437436] [<ffffffff817d6f06>] submit_bio_wait+0x56/0x70
> > [ 243.438671] [<ffffffff817e851a>] blkdev_issue_discard+0x6a/0xb0
> > [ 243.439980] [<ffffffff810dab69>] ? __might_sleep+0x49/0x80
> > [ 243.441182] [<ffffffff817eea87>] blk_ioctl_discard+0x97/0xb0
> > [ 243.442370] [<ffffffff817ef7bb>] blkdev_ioctl+0x7eb/0x9a0
> > [ 243.443485] [<ffffffff81236a1d>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x50
> > [ 243.444552] [<ffffffff812100df>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x670
> > [ 243.445630] [<ffffffff81002434>] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x94/0xb0
> > [ 243.446902] [<ffffffff81210739>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> > [ 243.447927] [<ffffffff81002bc5>] ? syscall_return_slowpath+0xf5/0x190
> > [ 243.449236] [<ffffffff81e63d32>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa4
> >
> > This only reproduces when the underlying filesystem is mounted with
> > -o dax, so there is a bad interaction with loop devices and DAX
> > occurring somewhere. generic/361 is a recent test (committed june 14)
> > so this probably hasn't actually been tested until now.
> >
> > I haven't got time to look at this right now, hence the report.
>
> Cool, thanks for the report. I've reproduced this with linux/master, and the
> test passes with v4.7.
>
> Running a bisect...
This bisected to a commit to the block layer code. I've sent a bug report to
the author of the commit.
- Ross
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 0:33 [4.8 hang] xfstests generic/361 hangs on dax enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2016-08-03 0:59 ` Dan Williams
2016-08-03 17:11 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-08-03 22:37 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-08-03 23:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-04 2:52 ` Dan Williams
2016-08-04 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-04 18:46 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-08-04 18:54 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160803223713.GA22364@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).