linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs: separate function to check if reflink flag needed
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:05:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170606180538.GC5196@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606162833.GD55166@bfoster.bfoster>

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:28:33PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:24:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Separate the "clear reflink flag" function into one function that checks
> > if the flag is needed, and a second function that checks and clears the
> > flag.  The inode scrub code will want to check the necessity of the flag
> > without clearing it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |   88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h |    2 +
> >  2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > index e25c995..133ee02 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > @@ -1406,57 +1406,73 @@ xfs_reflink_dirty_extents(
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Clear the inode reflink flag if there are no shared extents. */
> > +/* Does this inode need the reflink flag? */
> >  int
> > -xfs_reflink_clear_inode_flag(
> > -	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> > -	struct xfs_trans	**tpp)
> > +xfs_reflink_needs_inode_flag(
> > +	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> > +	struct xfs_inode		*ip,
> > +	bool				*needs_flag)
> 
> This looks Ok to me, but just a nit that the _needs_inode_flag() name
> sounds slightly confusing to me because any context around the flag is
> now isolated to the caller. Could we call this something more generic
> like _has_shared_extents() (and rename needs_flag appropriately as
> well)?

Yes, that's a much better name. :)

int xfs_reflink_inode_has_shared_extents(..., bool *has_shared);

--D

> 
> Brian
> 
> >  {
> > -	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
> > -	xfs_fileoff_t		fbno;
> > -	xfs_filblks_t		end;
> > -	xfs_agnumber_t		agno;
> > -	xfs_agblock_t		agbno;
> > -	xfs_extlen_t		aglen;
> > -	xfs_agblock_t		rbno;
> > -	xfs_extlen_t		rlen;
> > -	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	map;
> > -	int			nmaps;
> > -	int			error = 0;
> > -
> > -	ASSERT(xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip));
> > +	struct xfs_bmbt_irec		got;
> > +	struct xfs_mount		*mp = ip->i_mount;
> > +	struct xfs_ifork		*ifp;
> > +	xfs_agnumber_t			agno;
> > +	xfs_agblock_t			agbno;
> > +	xfs_extlen_t			aglen;
> > +	xfs_agblock_t			rbno;
> > +	xfs_extlen_t			rlen;
> > +	xfs_extnum_t			idx;
> > +	bool				found;
> > +	int				error;
> >  
> > -	fbno = 0;
> > -	end = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, i_size_read(VFS_I(ip)));
> > -	while (end - fbno > 0) {
> > -		nmaps = 1;
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Look for extents in the file.  Skip holes, delalloc, or
> > -		 * unwritten extents; they can't be reflinked.
> > -		 */
> > -		error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, fbno, end - fbno, &map, &nmaps, 0);
> > +	ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> > +	if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) {
> > +		error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> >  		if (error)
> >  			return error;
> > -		if (nmaps == 0)
> > -			break;
> > -		if (!xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(&map))
> > -			goto next;
> > +	}
> >  
> > -		agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, map.br_startblock);
> > -		agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(mp, map.br_startblock);
> > -		aglen = map.br_blockcount;
> > +	*needs_flag = false;
> > +	found = xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ifp, 0, &idx, &got);
> > +	while (found) {
> > +		if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock) ||
> > +		    got.br_state != XFS_EXT_NORM)
> > +			goto next;
> > +		agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, got.br_startblock);
> > +		agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(mp, got.br_startblock);
> > +		aglen = got.br_blockcount;
> >  
> > -		error = xfs_reflink_find_shared(mp, *tpp, agno, agbno, aglen,
> > +		error = xfs_reflink_find_shared(mp, tp, agno, agbno, aglen,
> >  				&rbno, &rlen, false);
> >  		if (error)
> >  			return error;
> >  		/* Is there still a shared block here? */
> > -		if (rbno != NULLAGBLOCK)
> > +		if (rbno != NULLAGBLOCK) {
> > +			*needs_flag = true;
> >  			return 0;
> > +		}
> >  next:
> > -		fbno = map.br_startoff + map.br_blockcount;
> > +		found = xfs_iext_get_extent(ifp, ++idx, &got);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Clear the inode reflink flag if there are no shared extents. */
> > +int
> > +xfs_reflink_clear_inode_flag(
> > +	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> > +	struct xfs_trans	**tpp)
> > +{
> > +	bool			needs;
> > +	int			error = 0;
> > +
> > +	ASSERT(xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip));
> > +
> > +	error = xfs_reflink_needs_inode_flag(*tpp, ip, &needs);
> > +	if (error || needs)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We didn't find any shared blocks so turn off the reflink flag.
> >  	 * First, get rid of any leftover CoW mappings.
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> > index b8cc5c3..a26d795 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ extern int xfs_reflink_end_cow(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
> >  extern int xfs_reflink_recover_cow(struct xfs_mount *mp);
> >  extern int xfs_reflink_remap_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >  		struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len, bool is_dedupe);
> > +extern int xfs_reflink_needs_inode_flag(struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > +		struct xfs_inode *ip, bool *needs_flag);
> >  extern int xfs_reflink_clear_inode_flag(struct xfs_inode *ip,
> >  		struct xfs_trans **tpp);
> >  extern int xfs_reflink_unshare(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-06 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-02 21:24 [PATCH v7 00/13] xfs: preparing for online scrub support Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: optimize _btree_query_all Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 13:32   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-06 17:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07  1:18   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07 14:22     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: remove double-underscore integer types Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: always compile the btree inorder check functions Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 13:32   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: export various function for the online scrubber Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 13:32   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: plumb in needed functions for range querying of various btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 13:33   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: export _inobt_btrec_to_irec and _ialloc_cluster_alignment for scrub Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 16:27   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-06 17:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: check if an inode is cached and allocated Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 16:28   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-06 18:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07 14:22       ` Brian Foster
2017-06-15  5:00         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07  1:21   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-16 17:59   ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-19 12:07     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: reflink find shared should take a transaction Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 16:28   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:24 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: separate function to check if reflink flag needed Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 16:28   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-06 18:05     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-06-07  1:26   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07 14:22     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: refactor the ifork block counting function Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 16:29   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-06 18:51     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-06 20:35       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07  1:29   ` [PATCH v2 9.9/13] xfs: make _bmap_count_blocks consistent wrt delalloc extent behavior Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07 15:11     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-07 16:19       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07  1:29   ` [PATCH v2 10/13] xfs: refactor the ifork block counting function Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-07 15:11     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: return the hash value of a leaf1 directory block Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 13:02   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-08 15:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 16:31       ` Brian Foster
2017-06-08 16:43         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 16:52           ` Brian Foster
2017-06-08 18:22   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-09 12:54     ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: pass along transaction context when reading directory block buffers Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 13:02   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 21:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: pass along transaction context when reading xattr " Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 13:02   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-02 22:19 ` [PATCH 14/13] xfs: allow reading of already-locked remote symbolic link Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-08 13:02   ` Brian Foster
2017-06-26  6:04 ` [PATCH 15/13] xfs: grab dquots without taking the ilock Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-27 11:00   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170606180538.GC5196@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).