From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] repair: Protect bad inode list with mutex
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:44:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030174434.GJ4135@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181030112043.6034-6-david@fromorbit.com>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:20:41PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> To enable phase 6 parallelisation, we need to protect the bad inode
> list from concurrent modification and/or access. Wrap it with a
> mutex and clean up the nasty typedefs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> repair/dir2.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/repair/dir2.c b/repair/dir2.c
> index ba5763ed3d26..a73a675b97c8 100644
> --- a/repair/dir2.c
> +++ b/repair/dir2.c
> @@ -20,40 +20,50 @@
> * Known bad inode list. These are seen when the leaf and node
> * block linkages are incorrect.
> */
> -typedef struct dir2_bad {
> +struct dir2_bad {
> xfs_ino_t ino;
> struct dir2_bad *next;
> -} dir2_bad_t;
> +};
Just out of curiosity, how fast does this linked list grow? In theory
we could hoist scrub/bitmap.c to libfrog and turn this into a bitmap,
but that probably depends on how often we find inodes with bad link
counts...? And admittedly, avlnodes aren't cheap either...
Anyway, this patch itself looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
>
> -static dir2_bad_t *dir2_bad_list;
> +static struct dir2_bad *dir2_bad_list;
> +pthread_mutex_t dir2_bad_list_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>
> static void
> dir2_add_badlist(
> xfs_ino_t ino)
> {
> - dir2_bad_t *l;
> + struct dir2_bad *l;
>
> - if ((l = malloc(sizeof(dir2_bad_t))) == NULL) {
> + l = malloc(sizeof(*l));
> + if (!l) {
> do_error(
> _("malloc failed (%zu bytes) dir2_add_badlist:ino %" PRIu64 "\n"),
> - sizeof(dir2_bad_t), ino);
> + sizeof(*l), ino);
> exit(1);
> }
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&dir2_bad_list_lock);
> l->next = dir2_bad_list;
> dir2_bad_list = l;
> l->ino = ino;
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&dir2_bad_list_lock);
> }
>
> int
> dir2_is_badino(
> xfs_ino_t ino)
> {
> - dir2_bad_t *l;
> + struct dir2_bad *l;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - for (l = dir2_bad_list; l; l = l->next)
> - if (l->ino == ino)
> - return 1;
> - return 0;
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&dir2_bad_list_lock);
> + for (l = dir2_bad_list; l; l = l->next) {
> + if (l->ino == ino) {
> + ret = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&dir2_bad_list_lock);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 11:20 [PATCH 0/7] xfs_repair: scale to 150,000 iops Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] Revert "xfs_repair: treat zero da btree pointers as corruption" Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 19:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-10-30 20:11 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] repair: don't dirty inodes which are not unlinked Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 20:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-10-30 20:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-10-30 20:34 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-10-30 20:58 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] cache: prevent expansion races Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 20:35 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-31 17:13 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-01 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-01 13:17 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-01 21:23 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-02 11:31 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-02 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: bound maximum queue depth Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 20:53 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-31 17:14 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] repair: Protect bad inode list with mutex Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:44 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-30 20:54 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] repair: protect inode chunk tree records with a mutex Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 11:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] repair: parallelise phase 6 Dave Chinner
2018-10-30 17:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-30 20:55 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-07 5:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] xfs_repair: scale to 150,000 iops Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2018-11-07 6:48 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181030174434.GJ4135@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).