From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40562 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729737AbeKACdM (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:33:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D701130917AF for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 01:35:49 +0800 From: Zorro Lang Subject: Re: xfsdump usecases Message-ID: <20181031173549.GI2279@dhcp-12-117.nay.redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Jan Tulak Cc: linux-xfs On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:42:54PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote: > Hi guys > > I'm doing some cleanup of xfsdump code and the testing infrastructure > for it in xfstests is rather small, for the number of options and > modes xfsdump has. So, I'm asking you if you have any scripts using > xfsdump and xfsrestore, or some custom test suite, can you share it? I > will polish it and put into xfstests. Hi Jan, Unfortunately, we don't have more internal test cases (than xfstests) about xfsdump/xfsrestore. There's not much bugs(from customers/partners) about xfsdump, and it keeps stable(no big changes) long time, so writing cases for it always be low priority jobs for us. I can help to write some cases or do some tests if you need. Thanks, Zorro > > > Thanks, > Jan