From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] shrinkers: use will_defer for GFP_NOFS sensitive shrinkers
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:27:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802152737.GB60893@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801021752.4986-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:17:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> For shrinkers that currently avoid scanning when called under
> GFP_NOFS contexts, conver them to use the new ->will_defer flag
> rather than checking and returning errors during scans.
>
> This makes it very clear that these shrinkers are not doing any work
> because of the context limitations, not because there is no work
> that can be done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/gfs2/glock.c | 5 +++--
> fs/gfs2/quota.c | 6 +++---
> fs/nfs/dir.c | 6 +++---
> fs/super.c | 6 +++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 4 ++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 11 ++++++++---
> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 5 ++---
> 8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index ca0849043f54..6e0f76532535 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1680,6 +1680,10 @@ xfs_buftarg_shrink_count(
> {
> struct xfs_buftarg *btp = container_of(shrink,
> struct xfs_buftarg, bt_shrinker);
> +
> + if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
> + sc->will_defer = true;
> +
> return list_lru_shrink_count(&btp->bt_lru, sc);
> }
This hunk looks like a behavior change / bug fix..? The rest of the
patch converts existing logic to bail out of scans to use the new count
time defer mechanism. The change is probably fine, but I think we should
have a separate patch to introduce this behavior in the first place
(which BTW could be sent as a standalone patch and just picked up by
this on eventual rebase).
Brian
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> index 5e7a37f0cf84..13c842e8f13b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> @@ -502,9 +502,6 @@ xfs_qm_shrink_scan(
> unsigned long freed;
> int error;
>
> - if ((sc->gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) != (__GFP_FS|__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
> - return 0;
> -
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&isol.buffers);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&isol.dispose);
>
> @@ -534,6 +531,14 @@ xfs_qm_shrink_count(
> struct xfs_quotainfo *qi = container_of(shrink,
> struct xfs_quotainfo, qi_shrinker);
>
> + /*
> + * __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used here to avoid blocking kswapd
> + */
> + if ((sc->gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) !=
> + (__GFP_FS|__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) {
> + sc->will_defer = true;
> + }
> +
> return list_lru_shrink_count(&qi->qi_lru, sc);
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> index cdb05b48de44..6babcbac4a00 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> @@ -527,9 +527,6 @@ static unsigned long
> rpcauth_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>
> {
> - if ((sc->gfp_mask & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL)
> - return SHRINK_STOP;
> -
> /* nothing left, don't come back */
> if (list_empty(&cred_unused))
> return SHRINK_STOP;
> @@ -541,6 +538,8 @@ static unsigned long
> rpcauth_cache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>
> {
> + if ((sc->gfp_mask & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL)
> + sc->will_defer = true;
> return number_cred_unused * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure / 100;
> }
>
> --
> 2.22.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 2:17 [RFC] [PATCH 00/24] mm, xfs: non-blocking inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 01/24] mm: directed shrinker work deferral Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 15:27 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-04 1:49 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-05 17:42 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-05 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 12:27 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-06 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-07 11:13 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 02/24] shrinkers: use will_defer for GFP_NOFS sensitive shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 15:27 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-08-04 1:50 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 03/24] mm: factor shrinker work calculations Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 15:08 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-04 2:05 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 15:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 04/24] shrinker: defer work only to kswapd Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-04 16:48 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-04 21:37 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-07 16:12 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-07 18:00 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 05/24] shrinker: clean up variable types and tracepoints Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 06/24] mm: reclaim_state records pages reclaimed, not slabs Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 07/24] mm: back off direct reclaim on excessive shrinker deferral Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 08/24] mm: kswapd backoff for shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 09/24] xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 13:39 ` Chris Mason
2019-08-01 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-02 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-02 14:11 ` Chris Mason
2019-08-02 18:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-02 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-05 18:32 ` Chris Mason
2019-08-05 23:09 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 10/24] xfs: fix missed wakeup on l_flush_wait Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 11/24] xfs:: account for memory freed from metadata buffers Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-01 9:21 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 12/24] xfs: correctly acount for reclaimable slabs Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 21:05 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 13/24] xfs: synchronous AIL pushing Dave Chinner
2019-08-05 17:51 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-05 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 12:29 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 14/24] xfs: tail updates only need to occur when LSN changes Dave Chinner
2019-08-05 17:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-05 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 5:33 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 12:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-06 21:11 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 15/24] xfs: eagerly free shadow buffers to reduce CIL footprint Dave Chinner
2019-08-05 18:03 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-05 23:33 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 12:57 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-06 21:21 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 16/24] xfs: Lower CIL flush limit for large logs Dave Chinner
2019-08-04 17:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 17/24] xfs: don't block kswapd in inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 18:21 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-06 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-07 11:14 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 18/24] xfs: reduce kswapd blocking on inode locking Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 18:22 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-06 21:33 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-07 11:30 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-07 23:16 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 19/24] xfs: kill background reclaim work Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 20/24] xfs: use AIL pushing for inode reclaim IO Dave Chinner
2019-08-07 18:09 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-07 23:10 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-08 16:20 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 21/24] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes() Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 22/24] xfs: track reclaimable inodes using a LRU list Dave Chinner
2019-08-08 16:36 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-09 0:10 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 23/24] xfs: reclaim inodes from the LRU Dave Chinner
2019-08-08 16:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-09 1:20 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-09 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-11 2:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-11 12:46 ` Brian Foster
2019-08-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 24/24] xfs: remove unusued old inode reclaim code Dave Chinner
2019-08-06 5:57 ` [RFC] [PATCH 00/24] mm, xfs: non-blocking inode reclaim Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 21:37 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802152737.GB60893@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).