From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41124 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731844AbfHHI16 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 04:27:58 -0400 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: [PATCH 2/9] cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method. Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:27:37 +0200 Message-Id: <20190808082744.31405-3-cmaiolino@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190808082744.31405-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> References: <20190808082744.31405-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: hch@lst.de, adilger@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, rpeterso@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Replace the direct usage of ->bmap method by a bmap() call. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino --- fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c index 44a3ce1e4ce4..073c14cae6aa 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c +++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, struct cachefiles_object *object; struct cachefiles_cache *cache; struct inode *inode; - sector_t block0, block; + sector_t block; unsigned shift; int ret; @@ -412,7 +412,6 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, inode = d_backing_inode(object->backer); ASSERT(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)); - ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap); ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->readpages); /* calculate the shift required to use bmap */ @@ -428,12 +427,14 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, * enough for this as it doesn't indicate errors, but it's all we've * got for the moment */ - block0 = page->index; - block0 <<= shift; + block = page->index; + block <<= shift; + + ret = bmap(inode, &block); + ASSERT(!ret); - block = inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap(inode->i_mapping, block0); _debug("%llx -> %llx", - (unsigned long long) block0, + (unsigned long long) (page->index << shift), (unsigned long long) block); if (block) { @@ -711,7 +712,6 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, inode = d_backing_inode(object->backer); ASSERT(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)); - ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap); ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->readpages); /* calculate the shift required to use bmap */ @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, ret = space ? -ENODATA : -ENOBUFS; list_for_each_entry_safe(page, _n, pages, lru) { - sector_t block0, block; + sector_t block; /* we assume the absence or presence of the first block is a * good enough indication for the page as a whole @@ -736,13 +736,14 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, * good enough for this as it doesn't indicate errors, but * it's all we've got for the moment */ - block0 = page->index; - block0 <<= shift; + block = page->index; + block <<= shift; + + ret = bmap(inode, &block); + ASSERT(!ret); - block = inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap(inode->i_mapping, - block0); _debug("%llx -> %llx", - (unsigned long long) block0, + (unsigned long long) (page->index << shift), (unsigned long long) block); if (block) { -- 2.20.1