From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: "Andreas Grünbacher" <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
jencce.kernel@gmail.com, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
cluster-devel <cluster-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iomap: partially revert 4721a601099 (simulated directio short read on EFAULT)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:36:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829013604.GQ7239@dhcp-12-102.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190828142332.GT1037422@magnolia>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:23:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:23:49PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > Hi Darrick,
> >
> > Am So., 2. Dez. 2018 um 19:13 Uhr schrieb Darrick J. Wong
> > <darrick.wong@oracle.com>:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > In commit 4721a601099, we tried to fix a problem wherein directio reads
> > > into a splice pipe will bounce EFAULT/EAGAIN all the way out to
> > > userspace by simulating a zero-byte short read. This happens because
> > > some directio read implementations (xfs) will call
> > > bio_iov_iter_get_pages to grab pipe buffer pages and issue asynchronous
> > > reads, but as soon as we run out of pipe buffers that _get_pages call
> > > returns EFAULT, which the splice code translates to EAGAIN and bounces
> > > out to userspace.
> > >
> > > In that commit, the iomap code catches the EFAULT and simulates a
> > > zero-byte read, but that causes assertion errors on regular splice reads
> > > because xfs doesn't allow short directio reads. This causes infinite
> > > splice() loops and assertion failures on generic/095 on overlayfs
> > > because xfs only permit total success or total failure of a directio
> > > operation. The underlying issue in the pipe splice code has now been
> > > fixed by changing the pipe splice loop to avoid avoid reading more data
> > > than there is space in the pipe.
> > >
> > > Therefore, it's no longer necessary to simulate the short directio, so
> > > remove the hack from iomap.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4721a601099 ("iomap: dio data corruption and spurious errors when pipes fill")
> > > Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: split into two patches per hch request
> > > ---
> > > fs/iomap.c | 9 ---------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
> > > index 3ffb776fbebe..d6bc98ae8d35 100644
> > > --- a/fs/iomap.c
> > > +++ b/fs/iomap.c
> > > @@ -1877,15 +1877,6 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > > dio->wait_for_completion = true;
> > > ret = 0;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * Splicing to pipes can fail on a full pipe. We have to
> > > - * swallow this to make it look like a short IO
> > > - * otherwise the higher splice layers will completely
> > > - * mishandle the error and stop moving data.
> > > - */
> > > - if (ret == -EFAULT)
> > > - ret = 0;
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > pos += ret;
> >
> > I'm afraid this breaks the following test case on xfs and gfs2, the
> > two current users of iomap_dio_rw.
>
> Hmm, I had kinda wondered if regular pipes still needed this help.
> Evidently we don't have a lot of splice tests in fstests. :(
>
> > Here, the splice system call fails with errno = EAGAIN when trying to
> > "move data" from a file opened with O_DIRECT into a pipe.
> >
> > The test case can be run with option -d to not use O_DIRECT, which
> > makes the test succeed.
> >
> > The -r option switches from reading from the pipe sequentially to
> > reading concurrently with the splice, which doesn't change the
> > behavior.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> This would be great as an xfstest! :)
JFYI, I added splice operation into fsstress, and I tried to add splice operation
into xfs_io long time ago:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=155828702128047&w=2
But it haven't been merged. If you have any suggestion, please feel free to
review it:)
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> Do you have one ready to go, or should I just make one from the source
> code?
>
> --D
>
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
> > =================================== 8< ===================================
> > #define _GNU_SOURCE
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > #include <sys/wait.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <err.h>
> >
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <errno.h>
> >
> > #define SECTOR_SIZE 512
> > #define BUFFER_SIZE (150 * SECTOR_SIZE)
> >
> > void read_from_pipe(int fd, const char *filename, size_t size)
> > {
> > char buffer[SECTOR_SIZE];
> > size_t sz;
> > ssize_t ret;
> >
> > while (size) {
> > sz = size;
> > if (sz > sizeof buffer)
> > sz = sizeof buffer;
> > ret = read(fd, buffer, sz);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > err(1, "read: %s", filename);
> > if (ret == 0) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "read: %s: unexpected EOF\n", filename);
> > exit(1);
> > }
> > size -= sz;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > void do_splice1(int fd, const char *filename, size_t size)
> > {
> > bool retried = false;
> > int pipefd[2];
> >
> > if (pipe(pipefd) == -1)
> > err(1, "pipe");
> > while (size) {
> > ssize_t spliced;
> >
> > spliced = splice(fd, NULL, pipefd[1], NULL, size, SPLICE_F_MOVE);
> > if (spliced == -1) {
> > if (errno == EAGAIN && !retried) {
> > retried = true;
> > fprintf(stderr, "retrying splice\n");
> > sleep(1);
> > continue;
> > }
> > err(1, "splice");
> > }
> > read_from_pipe(pipefd[0], filename, spliced);
> > size -= spliced;
> > }
> > close(pipefd[0]);
> > close(pipefd[1]);
> > }
> >
> > void do_splice2(int fd, const char *filename, size_t size)
> > {
> > bool retried = false;
> > int pipefd[2];
> > int pid;
> >
> > if (pipe(pipefd) == -1)
> > err(1, "pipe");
> >
> > pid = fork();
> > if (pid == 0) {
> > close(pipefd[1]);
> > read_from_pipe(pipefd[0], filename, size);
> > exit(0);
> > } else {
> > close(pipefd[0]);
> > while (size) {
> > ssize_t spliced;
> >
> > spliced = splice(fd, NULL, pipefd[1], NULL, size, SPLICE_F_MOVE);
> > if (spliced == -1) {
> > if (errno == EAGAIN && !retried) {
> > retried = true;
> > fprintf(stderr, "retrying splice\n");
> > sleep(1);
> > continue;
> > }
> > err(1, "splice");
> > }
> > size -= spliced;
> > }
> > close(pipefd[1]);
> > waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > void usage(const char *argv0)
> > {
> > fprintf(stderr, "USAGE: %s [-rd] {filename}\n", basename(argv0));
> > exit(2);
> > }
> >
> > int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > {
> > void (*do_splice)(int fd, const char *filename, size_t size);
> > const char *filename;
> > char *buffer;
> > int opt, open_flags, fd;
> > ssize_t ret;
> >
> > do_splice = do_splice1;
> > open_flags = O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT;
> >
> > while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "rd")) != -1) {
> > switch(opt) {
> > case 'r':
> > do_splice = do_splice2;
> > break;
> > case 'd':
> > open_flags &= ~O_DIRECT;
> > break;
> > default: /* '?' */
> > usage(argv[0]);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > if (optind >= argc)
> > usage(argv[0]);
> > filename = argv[optind];
> >
> > printf("%s reader %s O_DIRECT\n",
> > do_splice == do_splice1 ? "sequential" : "concurrent",
> > (open_flags & O_DIRECT) ? "with" : "without");
> >
> > buffer = aligned_alloc(SECTOR_SIZE, BUFFER_SIZE);
> > if (buffer == NULL)
> > err(1, "aligned_alloc");
> >
> > fd = open(filename, open_flags, 0666);
> > if (fd == -1)
> > err(1, "open: %s", filename);
> >
> > memset(buffer, 'x', BUFFER_SIZE);
> > ret = write(fd, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > err(1, "write: %s", filename);
> > if (ret != BUFFER_SIZE) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "%s: short write\n", filename);
> > exit(1);
> > }
> >
> > ret = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> > if (ret != 0)
> > err(1, "lseek: %s", filename);
> >
> > do_splice(fd, filename, BUFFER_SIZE);
> >
> > if (unlink(filename) == -1)
> > err(1, "unlink: %s", filename);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > =================================== 8< ===================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-02 18:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] splice: don't read more than available pipe space Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-02 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iomap: partially revert 4721a601099 (simulated directio short read on EFAULT) Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-02 19:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-08-21 20:23 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2019-08-28 14:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-28 14:37 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2019-08-29 3:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-29 11:49 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2019-08-29 1:36 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829013604.GQ7239@dhcp-12-102.nay.redhat.com \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jencce.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).