From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: gg@magnolia, sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] libxfs: move topology declarations into separate header
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:16:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903031601.GU5354@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902223345.GS1119@dread.disaster.area>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 08:33:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 01:34:02PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > >
> > > > The topology functions live in libfrog now, which means their
> > > > declarations don't belong in libxcmd.h. Create new header file for
> > > > them.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/libxcmd.h | 31 -------------------------------
> > > > include/topology.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > libfrog/topology.c | 1 +
> > > > mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 2 +-
> > > > repair/sb.c | 1 +
> > > > 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 include/topology.h
> > >
> > > I like the idea, but I'm wondering if we should have a similar
> > > setup to libxfs header files here.
> > >
> > > i.e. the header file lives in libfrog/, and the install-headers make
> > > command creates include/libxfrog and links them for the build. That
> > > way the includes become namespaced like:
> > >
> > > #include "libxfrog/topology,h"
> > >
> > > and we don't pollute include with random header files from all
> > > different parts of xfsprogs...
> >
> > What if I leave topology.h in libfrog/ and then create an
> > include/libfrog.h that pulls in all the libfrog header files like
> > libxfs.h does, and then put -I$(TOPDIR)/libfrog in GCFLAGS?
>
> libxfs is a basket case - it's done that way so we don't need all
> the whacky games we play to shim the kernel functionality correctly
> in every xfsprogs file that needs libxfs functionality.
>
> libxfrog is very different - we have progs that just need topology
> or number conversion, but not both. I'd prefer for libxfrog we only
> include the headers we require, that way avoiding defining things we
> don't actually need...
Ok, will rework this tomorrow.
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-20 20:31 [PATCH 00/12] xfsprogs-5.3: various fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 01/12] libxfs-diff: try harder to find the kernel equivalent libxfs files Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:38 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 5:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] libxfs: move topology declarations into separate header Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-03 3:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-09-03 17:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 03/12] libfrog: try the v4 fs geometry ioctl after failing the v5 ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 04/12] man: document the new v5 fs geometry ioctl structures Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:44 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 05/12] man: document new fs summary counter scrub command Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:45 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 06/12] man: document the new allocation group geometry ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02 22:36 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-03 3:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 07/12] man: document the new health reporting fields in various ioctls Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:57 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs_db: remove db/convert.h Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 5:58 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs_db: add a function to compute btree geometry Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 6:12 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs_db: use precomputed inode geometry values Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 6:13 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs_repair: " Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 6:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs_repair: reduce the amount of "clearing reflink flag" messages Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 6:19 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903031601.GU5354@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=gg@magnolia \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).