linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, bfoster@redhat.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, renxudong1@huawei.com,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: add agf freeblocks verify in xfs_agf_verify
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:38:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200221153803.GP9506@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582260435-20939-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:47:15PM +0800, Zheng Bin wrote:
> We recently used fuzz(hydra) to test XFS and automatically generate
> tmp.img(XFS v5 format, but some metadata is wrong)
> 
> xfs_repair information(just one AG):
> agf_freeblks 0, counted 3224 in ag 0
> agf_longest 536874136, counted 3224 in ag 0
> sb_fdblocks 613, counted 3228
> 
> Test as follows:
> mount tmp.img tmpdir
> cp file1M tmpdir
> sync
> 
> In 4.19-stable, sync will stuck, the reason is:
> xfs_mountfs
>   xfs_check_summary_counts
>     if ((!xfs_sb_version_haslazysbcount(&mp->m_sb) ||
>        XFS_LAST_UNMOUNT_WAS_CLEAN(mp)) &&
>        !xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS))
> 	return 0;  -->just return, incore sb_fdblocks still be 613
>     xfs_initialize_perag_data
> 
> cp file1M tmpdir -->ok(write file to pagecache)
> sync -->stuck(write pagecache to disk)
> xfs_map_blocks
>   xfs_iomap_write_allocate
>     while (count_fsb != 0) {
>       nimaps = 0;
>       while (nimaps == 0) { --> endless loop
>          nimaps = 1;
>          xfs_bmapi_write(..., &nimaps) --> nimaps becomes 0 again
> xfs_bmapi_write
>   xfs_bmap_alloc
>     xfs_bmap_btalloc
>       xfs_alloc_vextent
>         xfs_alloc_fix_freelist
>           xfs_alloc_space_available -->fail(agf_freeblks is 0)
> 
> In linux-next, sync not stuck, cause commit c2b3164320b5 ("xfs:
> use the latest extent at writeback delalloc conversion time") remove
> the above while, dmesg is as follows:
> [   55.250114] XFS (loop0): page discard on page ffffea0008bc7380, inode 0x1b0c, offset 0.
> 
> Users do not know why this page is discard, the better soultion is:
> 1. Like xfs_repair, make sure sb_fdblocks is equal to counted
> (xfs_initialize_perag_data did this, who is not called at this mount)
> 2. Add agf verify, if fail, will tell users to repair
> 
> This patch use the second soultion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Xudong <renxudong1@huawei.com>

Looks ok, will give this a run through fuzz testing...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> ---
> 
> v1->v2: modify comment, add more agf verify
> v2->v3: modify code which is suggested by hellwig & darrick
> besides, remove the agf_freeblks < sb_fdblocks check, sb_fdblocks may not be true,
> if we have lazysbcount or not umount clean. If we check this, we need to add
> if ((!xfs_sb_version_haslazysbcount(&mp->m_sb) ||
>     XFS_LAST_UNMOUNT_WAS_CLEAN(mp)) &&
>     !xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS))
> like function xfs_check_summary_counts does.
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> index d8053bc..183dc25 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -2858,6 +2858,13 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount) <= xfs_agfl_size(mp)))
>  		return __this_address;
> 
> +	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length) > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
> +		return __this_address;
> +
> +	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) < be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_longest) ||
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> +		return __this_address;
> +
>  	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_BNO]) < 1 ||
>  	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_CNT]) < 1 ||
>  	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_BNO]) > XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS ||
> @@ -2869,6 +2876,10 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) > XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS))
>  		return __this_address;
> 
> +	if (xfs_sb_version_hasrmapbt(&mp->m_sb) &&
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> +		return __this_address;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * during growfs operations, the perag is not fully initialised,
>  	 * so we can't use it for any useful checking. growfs ensures we can't
> @@ -2883,6 +2894,11 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  		return __this_address;
> 
>  	if (xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb) &&
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_blocks) >
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> +		return __this_address;
> +
> +	if (xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb) &&
>  	    (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) < 1 ||
>  	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) > XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS))
>  		return __this_address;
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-21 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-21  4:47 [PATCH v3] xfs: add agf freeblocks verify in xfs_agf_verify Zheng Bin
2020-02-21 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-02-29 11:21   ` zhengbin (A)
2020-02-29 17:00     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200221153803.GP9506@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=renxudong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).