linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] xfs: hide most of the incore inode walk interface
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520185422.GY17627@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520064643.GK2742@lst.de>

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:46:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:46:27PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Hide the incore inode walk interface because callers outside of the
> > icache code don't need to know about iter_flags and radix tags and other
> > implementation details of the incore inode cache.
> 
> I don't really see the point here.  It isn't hiding much, and only from
> a single caller.  I have to say I also prefer the old naming over _ici_
> and find the _all postfix not exactly descriptive.

This last patch is more of a prep patch for the patchsets that come
after it: cleaning up the block gc stuff and deferred inode
inactivation.  It's getting kinda late so I didn't want to send 11 more
patches, but perhaps that would make it clearer where this is all
heading?

The quota dqrele_all code does not care about inode radix tree tags nor
does it need the ability to grab inodes /while/ they're in INEW state,
so there's no reason to pass those arguments around.

OTOH I guess I could have hid XFS_AGITER_INEW_WAIT in xfs_icache.c and
left the function names unchanged.

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-20 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20  1:45 [PATCH v3 00/11] xfs: refactor incore inode walking Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: move eofblocks conversion function to xfs_ioctl.c Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: replace open-coded XFS_ICI_NO_TAG Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remove unused xfs_inode_ag_iterator function Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: remove xfs_inode_ag_iterator_flags Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: remove flags argument from xfs_inode_ag_walk Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 18:36     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-21  9:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: remove __xfs_icache_free_eofblocks Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:46 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: refactor eofb matching into a single helper Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 18:35     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  1:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: fix inode ag walk predicate function return values Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: use bool for done in xfs_inode_ag_walk Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: move xfs_inode_ag_iterator to be closer to the perag walking code Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: hide most of the incore inode walk interface Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-20  6:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 18:54     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-05-21  9:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-01  1:05 [PATCH v2 00/11] xfs: refactor incore inode walking Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: hide most of the incore inode walk interface Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200520185422.GY17627@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).