linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:41:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200822074116.GA8859@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812092556.2567285-2-david@fromorbit.com>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:25:44PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> With the recent rework of the inode cluster flushing, we no longer
> ever wait on the the inode flush "lock". It was never a lock in the
> first place, just a completion to allow callers to wait for inode IO
> to complete. We now never wait for flush completion as all inode
> flushing is non-blocking. Hence we can get rid of all the iflock
> infrastructure and instead just set and check a state flag.
> 
> Rename the XFS_IFLOCK flag to XFS_IFLUSHING, convert all the
> xfs_iflock_nowait() test-and-set operations on that flag, and
> replace all the xfs_ifunlock() calls to clear operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c     | 17 ++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c      | 73 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h      | 33 +------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 15 ++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.h |  4 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c      | 11 ++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c      | 10 +++---
>  7 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index 101028ebb571..aa6aad258670 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc(
>  
>  	XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active);
>  	ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0);
> -	ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip));
>  	ASSERT(ip->i_ino == 0);
>  
>  	/* initialise the xfs inode */
> @@ -123,7 +122,7 @@ void
>  xfs_inode_free(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
>  {
> -	ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip));
> +	ASSERT(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IFLUSHING));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Because we use RCU freeing we need to ensure the inode always
> @@ -1035,23 +1034,21 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
>  
>  	if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL))
>  		goto out;
> -	if (!xfs_iflock_nowait(ip))
> +	if (xfs_iflags_test_and_set(ip, XFS_IFLUSHING))
>  		goto out_iunlock;
>  
>  	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
>  		xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
> -		/* xfs_iflush_abort() drops the flush lock */

Maybe keeps this as

		/*  xfs_iflush_abort() clears XFS_IFLUSHING */

> @@ -3661,7 +3643,6 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
>  		 */
>  		if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
>  			xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
> -			/* xfs_iflush_abort() drops the flush lock */

Same here.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-22  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12  9:25 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22  7:41   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2020-08-22  9:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: arrange all unlinked inodes into one list Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:45     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:58     ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-22  9:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23 17:24         ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24  8:19           ` [RFC PATCH] xfs: use log_incompat feature instead of speculate matching Gao Xiang
2020-08-24  8:34             ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 15:08               ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-24 15:41                 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 10:06                   ` [PATCH] " Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 14:54                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 15:30                       ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-27  7:19                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add unlink list pointers to xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:47     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22  9:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-25  5:17     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-27  7:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: replace iunlink backref lookups with list lookups Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:52     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: mapping unlinked inodes is now redundant Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: validate the unlinked list pointer on update Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: re-order AGI updates in unlink list updates Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  1:01     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:35   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reorder iunlink remove operation in xfs_ifree Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 11:12   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19  0:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:17 ` [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 20:01   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-18 21:42   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200822074116.GA8859@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).