From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEFBC433E1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C374B20706 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726471AbgHYWF3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:05:29 -0400 Received: from mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.80]:53878 "EHLO mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726303AbgHYWF3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:05:29 -0400 Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-181-146-199.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.181.146.199]) by mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A45D7D47D; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kAh4E-0000RK-Vc; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:22 +1000 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:22 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] iomap: Change calling convention for zeroing Message-ID: <20200825220522.GO12131@dread.disaster.area> References: <20200824145511.10500-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200824145511.10500-10-willy@infradead.org> <20200825002735.GI12131@dread.disaster.area> <20200825032603.GL17456@casper.infradead.org> <20200825042711.GL12131@dread.disaster.area> <20200825124024.GN17456@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200825124024.GN17456@casper.infradead.org> X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=QKgWuTDL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 cx=a_idp_d a=GorAHYkI+xOargNMzM6qxQ==:117 a=GorAHYkI+xOargNMzM6qxQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=y4yBn9ojGxQA:10 a=7-415B0cAAAA:8 a=2U9gKF9mzcrskAPIHE4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=n3xvM8a_0i4A:10 a=biEYGPWJfzWAr4FL6Ov7:22 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:40:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Any objection to leaving this patch as-is with a u64 length? No objection here - I just wanted to make sure that signed/unsigned overflow was not going to be an issue... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com