From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7D5C4363D for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224A20872 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="XAX9Ry7S" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728575AbgJGWFx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:05:53 -0400 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:46932 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728649AbgJGWFw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:05:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 097LmE8D137697; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:05:00 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=qdGKpyu4OZxeiTA6CHUVDy1/MmDPky7MC58vEE3yBus=; b=XAX9Ry7Sk2H+pH4XPIgVF6cxpwPdeDMYXm7PFQkVdCVHkYcUAPl13mxF7LHQ7UnaPixt 2ls6A1OPqc8NcrtZ+SmLkOC06s9uaFqRn7HQWjw2KVDDy7xRE1gHUgQS2biHusn4ddwV vgltHjdzRU+cssXl2S4iNK3OkRBKMV/ylgQDwnu4PfqXVxJf0pfoJLDRBe2UyMc+kU72 EtTem5x496vcBCem1BOtvGev4aluJvPVXU5JS01kGii0xy8piX+X9p/wC8M1diomqRTW dJIxAnfrlj0MEyfqhyMJxnLwJE/dot0tgNDidW3ldion4l43rCaXtETo5xDGN0PuDTRp 1Q== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33xetb4scg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 22:05:00 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 097LoEdU132282; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:04:59 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33y3804knr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 22:04:59 +0000 Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 097M4vmA007401; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:04:57 GMT Received: from localhost (/10.159.134.247) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:04:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:04:56 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: xiakaixu1987@gmail.com Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: check tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag Message-ID: <20201007220456.GC6540@magnolia> References: <1602082272-20242-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com> <1602082272-20242-5-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1602082272-20242-5-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9767 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2010070139 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9767 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2010070139 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:51:11PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@gmail.com wrote: > From: Kaixu Xia > > Nowadays the only things that the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag seems to do > are indicates the tp->t_dqinfo->dqs[XFS_QM_TRANS_{USR,GRP,PRJ}] values > changed and check in xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas() and the unreserve > variant xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_dquots(). Actually, we also can > use the tp->t_dqinfo value instead of the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY flag, that > is to say, we allocate the new tp->t_dqinfo only when the qtrx values > changed, so the tp->t_dqinfo value isn't NULL equals the XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY > flag is set, we only need to check if tp->t_dqinfo == NULL in > xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas() and its unreserve variant to determine > whether lock all of the dquots and join them to the transaction. > > Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 +------- > fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 17 ++--------------- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h > index c795ae47b3c9..8c61a461bf7b 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h > @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ void xfs_log_get_max_trans_res(struct xfs_mount *mp, > #define XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY 0x02 /* superblock is modified */ > #define XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES 0x04 /* xact took a permanent log res */ > #define XFS_TRANS_SYNC 0x08 /* make commit synchronous */ > -#define XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY 0x10 /* at least one dquot in trx dirty */ > #define XFS_TRANS_RESERVE 0x20 /* OK to use reserved data blocks */ > #define XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT 0x40 /* do not elevate SB writecount */ > #define XFS_TRANS_RES_FDBLKS 0x80 /* reserve newly freed blocks */ > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > index 49624973eecc..9108eed0ea45 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > @@ -941,7 +941,6 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc( > xfs_buf_t *ialloc_context = NULL; > int code; > void *dqinfo; > - uint tflags; > > tp = *tpp; > ASSERT(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES); > @@ -1000,12 +999,9 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc( > * and attach it to the next transaction. > */ > dqinfo = NULL; > - tflags = 0; > if (tp->t_dqinfo) { > dqinfo = (void *)tp->t_dqinfo; > tp->t_dqinfo = NULL; > - tflags = tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY; > - tp->t_flags &= ~(XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY); > } > > code = xfs_trans_roll(&tp); > @@ -1013,10 +1009,8 @@ xfs_dir_ialloc( > /* > * Re-attach the quota info that we detached from prev trx. > */ > - if (dqinfo) { > + if (dqinfo) > tp->t_dqinfo = dqinfo; > - tp->t_flags |= tflags; > - } > > if (code) { > xfs_buf_relse(ialloc_context); > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c > index 1b56065c9ff1..0ebfd7930382 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c > @@ -84,13 +84,6 @@ xfs_trans_dup_dqinfo( > > xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(ntp); > > - /* > - * Because the quota blk reservation is carried forward, > - * it is also necessary to carry forward the DQ_DIRTY flag. > - */ > - if (otp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY) > - ntp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY; > - > for (j = 0; j < XFS_QM_TRANS_DQTYPES; j++) { > oqa = otp->t_dqinfo->dqs[j]; > nqa = ntp->t_dqinfo->dqs[j]; > @@ -270,8 +263,6 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot( > > if (delta) > trace_xfs_trans_mod_dquot_after(qtrx); > - > - tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY; > } > > > @@ -348,7 +339,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas( > int64_t totalbdelta; > int64_t totalrtbdelta; > > - if (!(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY)) > + if (!tp->t_dqinfo) > return; > > ASSERT(tp->t_dqinfo); > @@ -490,7 +481,7 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_dquots( > struct xfs_dqtrx *qtrx, *qa; > bool locked; > > - if (!tp->t_dqinfo || !(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DQ_DIRTY)) > + if (!tp->t_dqinfo) > return; > > for (j = 0; j < XFS_QM_TRANS_DQTYPES; j++) { > @@ -695,7 +686,6 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv( > * because we don't have the luxury of a transaction envelope then. > */ > if (tp) { > - ASSERT(tp->t_dqinfo); > ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK); > if (nblks != 0) > xfs_trans_mod_dquot(tp, dqp, > @@ -749,9 +739,6 @@ xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots( > if (!XFS_IS_QUOTA_RUNNING(mp) || !XFS_IS_QUOTA_ON(mp)) > return 0; > > - if (tp && tp->t_dqinfo == NULL) > - xfs_trans_alloc_dqinfo(tp); > - This also should be a separate patch (or I guess the previous one?) in which the commit log points out that the allocation is already covered by the chain xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots -> xfs_trans_dqresv -> xfs_trans_mod_dquot. --D > ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK); > > if (udqp) { > -- > 2.20.0 >