linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] xfs: introduce xfs_validate_stripe_factors()
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2020 13:24:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201009052421.3328-3-hsiangkao@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201009052421.3328-1-hsiangkao@redhat.com>

Introduce a common helper to consolidate stripe validation process.
Also make kernel code xfs_validate_sb_common() use it first.

Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
---
 libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 libxfs/xfs_sb.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index 302eea16..0f2697ed 100644
--- a/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -357,21 +357,18 @@ xfs_validate_sb_common(
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (sbp->sb_unit) {
-		if (!xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(sbp) ||
-		    sbp->sb_unit > sbp->sb_width ||
-		    (sbp->sb_width % sbp->sb_unit) != 0) {
-			xfs_notice(mp, "SB stripe unit sanity check failed");
-			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
-		}
-	} else if (xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(sbp)) {
+	/*
+	 * Either (sb_unit and !hasdalign) or (!sb_unit and hasdalign)
+	 * would imply the image is corrupted.
+	 */
+	if (!sbp->sb_unit ^ !xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(sbp)) {
 		xfs_notice(mp, "SB stripe alignment sanity check failed");
 		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
-	} else if (sbp->sb_width) {
-		xfs_notice(mp, "SB stripe width sanity check failed");
-		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 	}
 
+	if (!xfs_validate_stripe_factors(mp, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_unit),
+					 XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_width), 0))
+		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 
 	if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb) &&
 	    sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_CRC_BLOCKSIZE) {
@@ -1208,3 +1205,49 @@ xfs_sb_get_secondary(
 	*bpp = bp;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/*
+ * sunit, swidth, sectorsize(optional with 0) should be all in bytes,
+ * so users won't be confused by values in error messages.
+ */
+bool
+xfs_validate_stripe_factors(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	__s64			sunit,
+	__s64			swidth,
+	int			sectorsize)
+{
+	if (sectorsize && sunit % sectorsize) {
+		xfs_notice(mp,
+"stripe unit (%lld) must be a multiple of the sector size (%d)",
+			   sunit, sectorsize);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (sunit && !swidth) {
+		xfs_notice(mp,
+"invalid stripe unit (%lld) and stripe width of 0", sunit);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (!sunit && swidth) {
+		xfs_notice(mp,
+"invalid stripe width (%lld) and stripe unit of 0", swidth);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (sunit > swidth) {
+		xfs_notice(mp,
+"stripe unit (%lld) is larger than the stripe width (%lld)", sunit, swidth);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (sunit && (swidth % sunit)) {
+		xfs_notice(mp,
+"stripe width (%lld) must be a multiple of the stripe unit (%lld)",
+			   swidth, sunit);
+		return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_sb.h b/libxfs/xfs_sb.h
index 92465a9a..2d3504eb 100644
--- a/libxfs/xfs_sb.h
+++ b/libxfs/xfs_sb.h
@@ -42,4 +42,7 @@ extern int	xfs_sb_get_secondary(struct xfs_mount *mp,
 				struct xfs_trans *tp, xfs_agnumber_t agno,
 				struct xfs_buf **bpp);
 
+extern bool	xfs_validate_stripe_factors(struct xfs_mount *mp,
+				__s64 sunit, __s64 swidth, int sectorsize);
+
 #endif	/* __XFS_SB_H__ */
-- 
2.18.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09  5:24 [PATCH v5 0/3] xfsprogs: consolidate stripe validation Gao Xiang
2020-10-09  5:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] libxfs: allow i18n to xfs printk Gao Xiang
2020-10-09  5:24 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2020-10-09  5:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mkfs: make use of xfs_validate_stripe_factors() Gao Xiang
2020-10-12 13:06   ` Brian Foster
2020-10-12 14:07     ` Gao Xiang
2020-10-12 14:20       ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201009052421.3328-3-hsiangkao@redhat.com \
    --to=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).