From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] fs: drop redundant check from __writeback_single_inode()
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 23:58:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210109075903.208222-9-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210109075903.208222-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
wbc->for_sync implies wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL, so there's no need
to check for both. Just check for WB_SYNC_ALL.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 80ee9816d9df5..cee1df6e3bd43 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
* change I_DIRTY_TIME into I_DIRTY_SYNC.
*/
if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) &&
- (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->for_sync ||
+ (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL ||
time_after(jiffies, inode->dirtied_time_when +
dirtytime_expire_interval * HZ))) {
trace_writeback_lazytime(inode);
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-09 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-09 7:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] lazytime fix and cleanups Eric Biggers
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] fs: fix lazytime expiration handling in __writeback_single_inode() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 10:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 14:46 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] fs: correctly document the inode dirty flags Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] fs: only specify I_DIRTY_TIME when needed in generic_update_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 14:50 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] fat: only specify I_DIRTY_TIME when needed in fat_update_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 19:50 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 5:21 ` Dave Chinner
2021-01-12 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 14:52 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 14:54 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] fs: pass only I_DIRTY_INODE flags to ->dirty_inode Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 14:56 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] fs: clean up __mark_inode_dirty() a bit Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 14:59 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:58 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-01-11 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] fs: drop redundant check from __writeback_single_inode() Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 15:00 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] fs: improve comments for writeback_single_inode() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 15:05 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] gfs2: don't worry about I_DIRTY_TIME in gfs2_fsync() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 15:06 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: simplify i_state checks in __ext4_update_other_inode_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-11 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 20:23 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-03 5:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-01-11 15:11 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-09 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] xfs: remove a stale comment from xfs_file_aio_write_checks() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 17:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-11 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] lazytime fix and cleanups Jan Kara
2021-01-11 20:44 ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-03 5:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-02-03 5:22 ` Eric Biggers
2021-02-03 15:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210109075903.208222-9-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).