linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@redhat.com>
Cc: Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] debian: xfsprogs package clean-up
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:42:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119214252.GU3134581@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFMei7MbBu9zfoXfE9+mTo1TtMzov-DEPWj6KPfw7Aa_PMnU4g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:26:45AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:16 AM Bastian Germann
> <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Nathan uploaded most of the versions, so I guess he can upload.
> > The Debian package is "team maintained" though with this list address as
> > recorded maintainer.
> >
> 
> You should have the necessary permissions to do uploads since
> yesterday Bastian - is that not the case?
> 
> BTW Eric, not directly related but I think the -rc versions being
> added to the debian/changelog can lead to some confusion - I *think*
> dpkg finds that version suffix to be more recent than the actual
> release version string (seems odd, but that seemed to be the behaviour
> I observed recently).  Could the release script(s) skip adding -rc
> versions to debian/changelog?

The release maintainer could also skip adding the ~rc tags to
debian/changelog since it's not like we're going to upload /that/ into
debian anyway.  All of my internal builds add their own tag with dch, so
it wouldn't matter much to me.

(But let's see if Dave has opinions...)

--D

> cheers.
> 
> --
> Nathan
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 18:37 [PATCH 0/6] debian: xfsprogs package clean-up Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] debian: cryptographically verify upstream tarball Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] debian: remove dependency on essential util-linux Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 20:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] debian: remove "Priority: extra" Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 20:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] debian: use Package-Type over its predecessor Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 20:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] debian: add missing copyright info Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 18:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] debian: new changelog entry Bastian Germann
2021-01-14 20:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-15  3:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] debian: xfsprogs package clean-up Nathan Scott
2021-01-15  4:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-15 18:31     ` Eric Sandeen
2021-01-15 18:35   ` Eric Sandeen
2021-01-16  9:34   ` Bastian Germann
2021-01-18  1:37     ` Nathan Scott
2021-01-16  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 " Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] debian: cryptographically verify upstream tarball Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] debian: remove dependency on essential util-linux Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] debian: remove "Priority: extra" Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] debian: use Package-Type over its predecessor Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] debian: add missing copyright info Bastian Germann
2021-01-16  9:23   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] debian: new changelog entry Bastian Germann
2021-01-17  1:09   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] debian: xfsprogs package clean-up Eric Sandeen
2021-01-18  1:24     ` Nathan Scott
2021-01-18 21:33   ` Eric Sandeen
2021-01-19 15:02     ` Bastian Germann
2021-01-19 17:07       ` Eric Sandeen
2021-01-19 17:16         ` Bastian Germann
2021-01-19 21:26           ` Nathan Scott
2021-01-19 21:35             ` Bastian Germann
2021-01-19 21:42             ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-01-19 22:00             ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119214252.GU3134581@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bastiangermann@fishpost.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathans@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).