From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AD8C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8229F61A1A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229548AbhCYIlc (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:41:32 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40191 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229659AbhCYIlS (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:41:18 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D19B968CF0; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:41:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] xfs: move the di_cowextsize field to struct xfs_inode Message-ID: <20210325084113.GC28146@lst.de> References: <20210324142129.1011766-1-hch@lst.de> <20210324142129.1011766-12-hch@lst.de> <20210324183130.GJ22100@magnolia> <20210324183349.GM22100@magnolia> <20210324184224.GT22100@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210324184224.GT22100@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:42:24AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > /me wonders if you wouldn't mind converting these open coded shifts to > > > XFS_FSB_TO_B and XFS_B_TO_FSBT as a new patch at the end of this series? > > > > Heh, you did already, ignore this question. :) > > ...and now I go for a record /third/ reply to ask if you wouldn't mind > adding a patch to do the XFS_B_TO_FSBT conversion on xfs_ioctl_setattr? Sure, I can add a patch for that.