From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F0AC433C1 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF8E619B6 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230336AbhCZCmZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:42:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33768 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230222AbhCZCmX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:42:23 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3EE9619B6; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616726542; bh=hP5zCpj24OBodWW6qlbP//7OFXT+60fQiV4lYTprKZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dOPzjRrNQNr9bRrdXD/XgXvMHAxOfNgJDDD0Fq1/hosj1RdWnlrPC4RGQ+4dTAH3B 9Ji2a5yQRg3+1O1TJarkp0UgdAKNrn/lZsbqTYh7SYXbUVAHyz/uR1VVoBAYg36Cmz XU4NVDq02+C7m86OTjL/XgZ9mH0yUGDNyhLBCujq807CQ187zyzXd+JjQGu20eoH4o xo08eE/ixtvF2YHn34p41n7LvGmuePeE/WYepNK0XrFAAjKKm3WEFZq0g8Q9LcurJz ddAe3rh4urtxnzi0NKiBPxCCSBgK7feslzTxP//Ua1JX4Tmak7Te6T95lUo/BXL3CR B2ATJ9ViFUq/A== Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:42:21 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: lukas@herbolt.com Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdocs: Small fix to correct first free inode to be 5847 not 5856. Message-ID: <20210326024221.GQ4090233@magnolia> References: <20210324184835.GU22100@magnolia> <20210325081416.3190060-1-lukas@herbolt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325081416.3190060-1-lukas@herbolt.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:14:16AM +0100, lukas@herbolt.com wrote: > From: Lukas Herbolt > > Thanks for confirmation, I was not sure about it. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt I'll massage the commit message a bit, but otherwise this looks fine. Thank you for the correction! Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong --D > --- > design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc b/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc > index 992615d..cdc8545 100644 > --- a/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc > +++ b/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc > @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ recs[1-85] = [startino,freecount,free] > Most of the inode chunks on this filesystem are totally full, since the +free+ > value is zero. This means that we ought to expect inode 160 to be linked > somewhere in the directory structure. However, notice that 0xff80000000000000 > -in record 85 -- this means that we would expect inode 5856 to be free. Moving > +in record 85 -- this means that we would expect inode 5847 to be free. Moving > on to the free inode B+tree, we see that this is indeed the case: > > ---- > -- > 2.26.2 >