From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: inode fork allocation depends on XFS_IFEXTENT flag
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:10:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406131051.GA3059873@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210406115923.1738753-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:59:21PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Due to confusion on when the XFS_IFEXTENT needs to be set, the
> changes in e6a688c33238 ("xfs: initialise attr fork on inode
> create") failed to set the flag when initialising the empty
> attribute fork at inode creation. Set this flag the same way
> xfs_bmap_add_attrfork() does after attry fork allocation.
>
> Fixes: e6a688c33238 ("xfs: initialise attr fork on inode create")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 11:59 [PATCH 0/4 v2] xfs: fix eager attr fork init regressions Dave Chinner
2021-04-06 11:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: eager inode attr fork init needs attr feature awareness Dave Chinner
2021-04-06 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-06 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-07 5:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-06 20:07 ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-06 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: inode fork allocation depends on XFS_IFEXTENT flag Dave Chinner
2021-04-06 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-04-06 20:07 ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-06 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: default attr fork size does not handle device inodes Dave Chinner
2021-04-06 20:07 ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-06 11:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: precalculate default inode attribute offset Dave Chinner
2021-04-06 20:08 ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-06 13:48 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] xfs: fix eager attr fork init regressions Brian Foster
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-30 5:30 [PATCH 0/4] " Dave Chinner
2021-03-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: inode fork allocation depends on XFS_IFEXTENT flag Dave Chinner
2021-03-30 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-30 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-02 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-03 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-04 3:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-02 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406131051.GA3059873@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).