From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6BEC48BC2 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B41C6102A for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230071AbhFUROX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:14:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53558 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230059AbhFUROX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:14:23 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B64F460FF2; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:12:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624295528; bh=HhfnTsMcscWDmzFalZgDJ1tnP8RQRTozYtuP1ozKBos=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=leM2haVEYCQtbwPeD5uAbf1LOr3HLt6R1y2aCmFRMU7viQjvBZgC/2JVyMMAbFawl EA/A5EYhHfQ7vZMFEqbw8GrIm77yteMFGtIe3pvkcO/C5HK2yqE5hlwCqnTVKSru2q o62bTC2bgSG9jodArQa67X1cMK+apTwMFzHvs14OrmlbE4V1euPtKzCDXfEhzeHEVk qxt+GgxWRKO+CcADZ1rr4t+wG02p3zSwTKxtS3LuwgyDARrbMLNUTduUG5ymCVxDOo yMilPA7XRxKIZQ3j37cn8URycUFqhDSRuBwP3hLcdwN2kwmashktTfEd1LLDCysOui SV5FJsONnj6Nw== Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:12:08 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Chinner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Allison Henderson , Chandan Babu R , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the xfs tree Message-ID: <20210621171208.GD3619569@locust> References: <20210621082656.59cae0d8@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210621082656.59cae0d8@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:26:56AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > 742140d2a486 ("xfs: xfs_log_force_lsn isn't passed a LSN") > e30fbb337045 ("xfs: Fix CIL throttle hang when CIL space used going backwards") > feb616896031 ("xfs: journal IO cache flush reductions") > 6a5c6f5ef0a4 ("xfs: remove need_start_rec parameter from xlog_write()") > d7693a7f4ef9 ("xfs: CIL checkpoint flushes caches unconditionally") > e45cc747a6fd ("xfs: async blkdev cache flush") > 9b845604a4d5 ("xfs: remove xfs_blkdev_issue_flush") > 25f25648e57c ("xfs: separate CIL commit record IO") > a6a65fef5ef8 ("xfs: log stripe roundoff is a property of the log") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers. Ok, I'll rebase the branch again to fix the paperwork errors. For future reference, if I want to continue accepting pull requests from other XFS developers, what are the applicable standards for adding the tree maintainer's (aka my) S-o-B tags? I can't add my own S-o-Bs after the fact without rewriting the branch history and changing the commit ids (which would lose the signed tag), so I guess that means the person sending the pull request has to add my S-o-B for me? Which also doesn't make sense? --D > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell