From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68620C4338F for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F17460EBC for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231651AbhHBWLZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:11:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58390 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230156AbhHBWLZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:11:25 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F9476054F; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:11:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1627942275; bh=MNUeBv9ft0RetGTZOlxcl7eTzXfcUZrSdI1kZW4bs8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=lNeRU9LWMtuPdcxfrzLFogG8H0lDUaXVUqfKVdYP8ESHS9VlNn0nRQYzjojXFiuJL zmuhtVZO0hsZ2ZXEwyweI5Y8QfBW1qGqFI3tXRr1d7gThfj18O4eEo7US+gR2zsV4p YWjFiBDqwVFyZ+O6VxgGW9ptpvgJyJ747+BZko1CEkirHM9SqjnbTcVxo6nOtZy5y3 /aH/m4Ab5O8aL7UYigGUtX4NoKKWOobckHhhkarGa/ptFA+zI7TqdaApKPPdRjZhQM a+V5Xaaxx8QS1z+cdhYYwfcia3IErl4H2VM6Z54Ck8e/j0xyL/4pin3VJmtAazIH1w dPKtTTReJr5Wg== Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:11:14 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , Gao Xiang , Andreas Gruenbacher , Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fsdevel , xfs Subject: iomap 5.15 branch construction ... Message-ID: <20210802221114.GG3601466@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone! iomap has become very popular for this cycle, with seemingly a lot of overlapping patches and whatnot. Does this accurately reflect all the stuff that people are trying to send for 5.15? 1. So far, I think these v2 patches from Christoph are ready to go: iomap: simplify iomap_readpage_actor iomap: simplify iomap_add_to_ioend 2. This is the v9 "iomap: Support file tail packing" patch from Gao, with a rather heavily edited commit: iomap: support reading inline data from non-zero pos Should I wait for a v10 patch with spelling fixes as requested by Andreas? And if there is a v10 submission, please update the commit message. 3. Matthew also threw in a patch: iomap: Support inline data with block size < page size for which Andreas also sent some suggestions, so I guess I'm waiting for a v2 of that patch? It looks to me like the last time he sent that series (on 24 July) he incorporated Gao's patch as patch 1 of the series? 4. Andreas has a patch: iomap: Fix some typos and bad grammar which looks more or less ready to go. 5. Christoph also had a series: RFC: switch iomap to an iterator model Which I reviewed and sent some comments for, but (AFAICT) haven't seen a non-RFC resubmission yet. Is that still coming for 5.15? 6. Earlier, Eric Biggers had a patchset that made some iomap changes ahead of porting f2fs to use directio. I /think/ those changes were dropped in the latest submission because the intended use of those changes (counters of the number of pages undergoing reads or writes, iirc?) has been replaced with something simpler. IOWs, f2fs doesn't need any iomap changes for 5.15, right? 7. Andreas also had a patchset: gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks That I've left unread because Linus started complaining about patch 1. Is that not going forward, then? So, I /think/ that's all I've received for this next cycle. Did I miss anything? Matthew said he might roll some of these up and send me a pull request, which would be nice... :) --D