From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB75DC4338F for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B840161051 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230214AbhHJHNj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:13:39 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34880 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229484AbhHJHNj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:13:39 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2FFD467373; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:13:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Matthew Wilcox , Andreas Gruenbacher , Shiyang Ruan , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/30] iomap: add the new iomap_iter model Message-ID: <20210810071312.GA16590@lst.de> References: <20210809061244.1196573-1-hch@lst.de> <20210809061244.1196573-12-hch@lst.de> <20210809221047.GC3657114@dread.disaster.area> <20210810064509.GI3601443@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210810064509.GI3601443@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 11:45:09PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > fs/iomap.c without having to take the tree back in time to find > > those files... > > ...or put the new code in apply.c, remove iomap_apply, and don't bother > with the renaming at all? > > I don't see much reason to break the git history. This is effectively a > new epoch in iomap, but that is plainly obvious from the function > declarations. > > I'll wander through the rest of the unreviewed patches tomorrow morning, > these are merely my off-the-cuff impressions. We could do all that, but why? There is no code even left from the apply area.