From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] xfs: pass the goal of the incore inode walk to xfs_inode_walk()
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:40:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210812214048.GE3657114@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812064222.GA20009@kili>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 09:42:22AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Darrick J. Wong,
>
> The patch c809d7e948a1: "xfs: pass the goal of the incore inode walk
> to xfs_inode_walk()" from Jun 1, 2021, leads to the following
> Smatch static checker warning:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:52 xfs_icwalk_tag()
> warn: unsigned 'goal' is never less than zero.
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> 49 static inline unsigned int
> 50 xfs_icwalk_tag(enum xfs_icwalk_goal goal)
> 51 {
> --> 52 return goal < 0 ? XFS_ICWALK_NULL_TAG : goal;
>
> This enum will be unsigned in GCC, so "goal" can't be negative.
I think this is incorrect. The original C standard defines enums as
signed integers, not unsigned. And according to the GCC manual
(section 4.9 Structures, Unions, Enumerations, and Bit-Fields)
indicates that C90 first defines the enum type to be compatible with
the declared values. IOWs, for a build using C89 like the kernel
does, enums should always be signed.
This enum is defined as:
enum xfs_icwalk_goal {
/* Goals that are not related to tags; these must be < 0. */
XFS_ICWALK_DQRELE = -1,
/* Goals directly associated with tagged inodes. */
XFS_ICWALK_BLOCKGC = XFS_ICI_BLOCKGC_TAG,
XFS_ICWALK_RECLAIM = XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG,
};
i.e. the enum is defined to clearly contain negative values and so
GCC should be defining it as a signed integer regardless of the
version of C being used...
> Plus
> we only pass 0-1 for goal (as far as Smatch can tell).
Yup, smatch has definitely got that one wrong:
xfs_dqrele_all_inodes()
xfs_icwalk(mp, XFS_ICWALK_DQRELE, &icw);
xfs_icwalk_get_perag(.... XFS_ICWALK_DQRELE)
xfs_icwalk_tag(... XFS_ICWALK_DQRELE, ...)
So this warning looks like an issue with smatch, not a bug in the
code...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 6:42 [bug report] xfs: pass the goal of the incore inode walk to xfs_inode_walk() Dan Carpenter
2021-08-12 21:40 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2021-08-12 22:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-12 23:57 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-13 8:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-08-13 7:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-08-13 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210812214048.GE3657114@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).