linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: only set IOMAP_F_SHARED when providing a srcmap to a write
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:33:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeajf6kp.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824003739.GC12640@magnolia>

On 24 Aug 2021 at 06:07, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> While prototyping a free space defragmentation tool, I observed an
> unexpected IO error while running a sequence of commands that can be
> recreated by the following sequence of commands:
>
> # xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 10m 0 10m" file1
> # cp --reflink=always file1 file2
> # punch-alternating -o 1 file2
> # xfs_io -c "funshare 0 10m" file2
> fallocate: Input/output error
>
> I then scraped this (abbreviated) stack trace from dmesg:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30788 at fs/iomap/buffered-io.c:577 iomap_write_begin+0x376/0x450
> CPU: 0 PID: 30788 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6-xfsx #rc6 5ef57b62a900814b3e4d885c755e9014541c8732
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:iomap_write_begin+0x376/0x450
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90000c0fc20 EFLAGS: 00010297
> RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffc90000c0fd10 RCX: 0000000000001000
> RDX: ffffc90000c0fc54 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 000000000000000c
> RBP: ffff888005d5dbd8 R08: 0000000000102000 R09: ffffc90000c0fc50
> R10: 0000000000b00000 R11: 0000000000101000 R12: ffffea0000336c40
> R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffc90000c0fd10 R15: 0000000000101000
> FS:  00007f4b8f62fe40(0000) GS:ffff88803ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000056361c554108 CR3: 000000000524e004 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> Call Trace:
>  iomap_unshare_actor+0x95/0x140
>  iomap_apply+0xfa/0x300
>  iomap_file_unshare+0x44/0x60
>  xfs_reflink_unshare+0x50/0x140 [xfs 61947ea9b3a73e79d747dbc1b90205e7987e4195]
>  xfs_file_fallocate+0x27c/0x610 [xfs 61947ea9b3a73e79d747dbc1b90205e7987e4195]
>  vfs_fallocate+0x133/0x330
>  __x64_sys_fallocate+0x3e/0x70
>  do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x7f4b8f79140a
>
> Looking at the iomap tracepoints, I saw this:
>
> iomap_iter:           dev 8:64 ino 0x100 pos 0 length 0 flags WRITE|0x80 (0x81) ops xfs_buffered_write_iomap_ops caller iomap_file_unshare
> iomap_iter_dstmap:    dev 8:64 ino 0x100 bdev 8:64 addr -1 offset 0 length 131072 type DELALLOC flags SHARED
> iomap_iter_srcmap:    dev 8:64 ino 0x100 bdev 8:64 addr 147456 offset 0 length 4096 type MAPPED flags
> iomap_iter:           dev 8:64 ino 0x100 pos 0 length 4096 flags WRITE|0x80 (0x81) ops xfs_buffered_write_iomap_ops caller iomap_file_unshare
> iomap_iter_dstmap:    dev 8:64 ino 0x100 bdev 8:64 addr -1 offset 4096 length 4096 type DELALLOC flags SHARED
> console:              WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30788 at fs/iomap/buffered-io.c:577 iomap_write_begin+0x376/0x450
>
> The first time funshare calls ->iomap_begin, xfs sees that the first
> block is shared and creates a 128k delalloc reservation in the COW fork.
> The delalloc reservation is returned as dstmap, and the shared block is
> returned as srcmap.  So far so good.
>
> funshare calls ->iomap_begin to try the second block.  This time there's
> no srcmap (punch-alternating punched it out!) but we still have the
> delalloc reservation in the COW fork.  Therefore, we again return the
> reservation as dstmap and the hole as srcmap.  iomap_unshare_iter
> incorrectly tries to unshare the hole, which __iomap_write_begin rejects
> because shared regions must be fully written and therefore cannot
> require zeroing.
>
> Therefore, change the buffered write iomap_begin function not to set
> IOMAP_F_SHARED when there isn't a source mapping to read from for the
> unsharing.

Indeed, the hole following the 0th extent isn't a "shared extent" as was
conveyed by xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(). With this patch applied,
iomap_unshare_actor() returns early since the extent described by iomap isn't
shared.

I am fine with either your version of the fix or the fix authored by
Christoph.

Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 7c69b124a475..abf6d60945ab 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	imap, cmap;
>  	struct xfs_iext_cursor	icur, ccur;
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		prealloc_blocks = 0;
> +	u16			cflags = 0;
>  	bool			eof = false, cow_eof = false, shared = false;
>  	int			allocfork = XFS_DATA_FORK;
>  	int			error = 0;
> @@ -1061,6 +1062,7 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  found_cow:
>  	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  	if (imap.br_startoff <= offset_fsb) {
> +		cflags = IOMAP_F_SHARED;
>  		error = xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, srcmap, &imap, 0);
>  		if (error)
>  			return error;
> @@ -1068,7 +1070,7 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  		xfs_trim_extent(&cmap, offset_fsb,
>  				imap.br_startoff - offset_fsb);
>  	}
> -	return xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, iomap, &cmap, IOMAP_F_SHARED);
> +	return xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, iomap, &cmap, cflags);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);


-- 
chandan

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24  0:37 [PATCH] xfs: only set IOMAP_F_SHARED when providing a srcmap to a write Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH] generic: regression test for a FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE bug in XFS Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24  7:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24  9:33   ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 15:17     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24  7:32 ` [PATCH] xfs: only set IOMAP_F_SHARED when providing a srcmap to a write Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 11:03 ` Chandan Babu R [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eeajf6kp.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
    --to=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).