linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	david <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] fsdax: Introduce dax_iomap_ops for end of reflink
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:01:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jbi=p=SjFYZcHnEAu+KY821pW_k_yA5u6hya4jEfrTUg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816060359.1442450-8-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>

On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:05 PM Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> After writing data, reflink requires end operations to remap those new
> allocated extents.  The current ->iomap_end() ignores the error code
> returned from ->actor(), so we introduce this dax_iomap_ops and change
> the dax_iomap_*() interfaces to do this job.
>
> - the dax_iomap_ops contains the original struct iomap_ops and fsdax
>     specific ->actor_end(), which is for the end operations of reflink
> - also introduce dax specific zero_range, truncate_page
> - create new dax_iomap_ops for ext2 and ext4
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/dax.c               | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  fs/ext2/ext2.h         |  3 ++
>  fs/ext2/file.c         |  6 ++--
>  fs/ext2/inode.c        | 11 +++++--
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h         |  3 ++
>  fs/ext4/file.c         |  6 ++--
>  fs/ext4/inode.c        | 13 ++++++--
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c |  3 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c |  3 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c      |  8 ++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c     | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h     | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c      |  7 ++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c   |  3 +-
>  include/linux/dax.h    | 21 ++++++++++---
>  include/linux/iomap.h  |  1 +
>  16 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 74dd918cff1f..0e0536765a7e 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -1348,11 +1348,30 @@ static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>         return done ? done : ret;
>  }
>
> +static inline int
> +__dax_iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct dax_iomap_ops *ops)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Call dax_iomap_ops->actor_end() before iomap_ops->iomap_end() in
> +        * each iteration.
> +        */
> +       if (iter->iomap.length && ops->actor_end) {
> +               ret = ops->actor_end(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len,
> +                                    iter->processed);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       return iomap_iter(iter, &ops->iomap_ops);

This reorganization looks needlessly noisy. Why not require the
iomap_end operation to perform the actor_end work. I.e. why can't
xfs_dax_write_iomap_actor_end() just be the passed in iomap_end? I am
not seeing where the ->iomap_end() result is ignored?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16  6:03 [PATCH v7 0/8] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] fsdax: Output address in dax_iomap_pfn() and rename it Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-18 21:01   ` Dan Williams
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] fsdax: Introduce dax_iomap_cow_copy() Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-19 22:35   ` Dan Williams
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] fsdax: Replace mmap entry in case of CoW Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-19 22:54   ` Dan Williams
2021-08-23 12:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-27  3:22       ` Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-27  5:00         ` Dan Williams
2021-08-27  5:26           ` Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] fsdax: Add dax_iomap_cow_copy() for dax_iomap_zero Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-20  2:39   ` Dan Williams
2021-08-27  3:23     ` Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] iomap: Introduce iomap_iter2 for two files Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-23 12:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] fsdax: Dedup file range to use a compare function Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-23 13:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] fsdax: Introduce dax_iomap_ops for end of reflink Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-20  3:01   ` Dan Williams [this message]
     [not found]     ` <c7e68dc8-5a43-f727-c262-58dcf244c711@fujitsu.com>
2021-08-20 15:18       ` Dan Williams
2021-08-23 13:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-27  3:29         ` Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-27  5:04           ` Dan Williams
2021-08-27  5:27             ` Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-16  6:03 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] fs/xfs: Add dax dedupe support Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-20  3:08   ` Dan Williams
2021-08-27  3:36     ` Shiyang Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4jbi=p=SjFYZcHnEAu+KY821pW_k_yA5u6hya4jEfrTUg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).