From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F37BC433EF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A87761164 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231331AbhIOSzc (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:55:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37050 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230300AbhIOSzb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:55:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFFEC061575 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id q23so1453754pfs.9 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:54:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FU15W3bm+SggfFBpu3PTbDkAmpOl9rR2fs66v56GTuA=; b=ci0GM5ZzWsDgYI4RF3fg/GEiOZ2FEpdwUx4HvXZ0z8NoNmt6ZvsTsrwErWm/Yzr37w gGOoKZXSetA44zYzYFlXcV//2m8UbC08VxxgJmEjTnRcQiXaBuE3e049pQqBypksWCbv zC1gXl4izxvk4l4mRD/cT3RPpvwRNQbo9GNWbwmuSYJXfcy+qLnKDIv+/SD6PWUp3dfr 3Ixmo0TVLxVpVKw09Hlyrcq2Y8g2ZSrohbHgoc0yJmkQYobB04sEaOmRlOHHEONNVIIN o0BBNoMaUmRivPlqly+NRb/WpvJA4lyXTmA9x3C8KNsyEtJCMHbPttX7OVBMbKd4pUOS d7JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FU15W3bm+SggfFBpu3PTbDkAmpOl9rR2fs66v56GTuA=; b=ouxESVbg34fOHQ/Kba1lImlHy76ydWkZQXGKrbBZq/jsZovvrGKJ+VfiAcQkwlZUuW 68kR0MlYIkaS2Xn/c8zBW363wbXiJ3xbWbpWrwAB200ahZn1yCgPaEmGCVKWOCsaj8Eh tkPPwrVbBjRL59GNN/TK6QyM1Zl5V5DENprLVd596xn71PXHFFEDYT8En1SrJklbtf+t lghrBNG4EKyVgeqGwNoiiqt1tMcb7dZmGrh2mMPBT8KKIgnnW/Eusur2RupzPRxav6D1 UPiGWCIY26XkQ/jJnPWALeAQE/BFOab6QDiA5w4sEyWLHEjI1ATaldoMZZFPUHfLYGJC 7x3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533O+HwueKUPYC//trH/ZkEVz2XQ9+pIp1lLupweSIkHUCz0qted ws1CQefr+eKAPLJHZbUdpVzslsWCmm1EGoLVVM2A7PiS/ow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5Z+fp+HWidXw4oZTfP/Ym5ru7neeSncy6m/5gaRdoxV2Mu68YpHNJnhyVCYH0ucb176R4DyZvDmyH9UVELwg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1a10:b0:412:448c:89ca with SMTP id g16-20020a056a001a1000b00412448c89camr1010006pfv.86.1631732052381; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:54:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1631726561-16358-1-git-send-email-sandeen@redhat.com> <1631726561-16358-2-git-send-email-sandeen@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1631726561-16358-2-git-send-email-sandeen@redhat.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:54:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: remove dax EXPERIMENTAL warning To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-xfs , linux-ext4 , linux-fsdevel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:23 AM Eric Sandeen wrote: > > As there seems to be no significant outstanding concern about > dax on xfs at this point, remove the scary EXPERIMENTAL > warning when in use. > > (dax+reflink is still unimplemented, but that can be considered > a future feature, and doesn't require a warning for the > non-reflink usecase.) The original concern was that dax-reflink could not be implemented without ABI regressions. As far as I can see that concern has been put to rest by the proposed patches. Am I wrong? So, if we're committed to not breaking past promises I think this change can be made out-of-order from when the reflink support patches land. Acked-by: Dan Williams ...but I'm also fine with waiting for the final reflink merge.