From: "ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: "djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 07:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB2920AD0C7FD02E238D0C387AF4FF9@OSBPR01MB2920.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78c22960-3f6d-8e5d-890a-72915236bedc@oracle.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()
>
>
> On 8/17/2021 10:43 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > More information -
> >
> > On 8/16/2021 10:20 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> >> Hi, ShiYang,
> >>
> >> So I applied the v6 patch series to my 5.14-rc3 as it's what you
> >> indicated is what v6 was based at, and injected a hardware poison.
> >>
> >> I'm seeing the same problem that was reported a while ago after the
> >> poison was consumed - in the SIGBUS payload, the si_addr is missing:
> >>
> >> ** SIGBUS(7): canjmp=1, whichstep=0, **
> >> ** si_addr(0x(nil)), si_lsb(0xC), si_code(0x4, BUS_MCEERR_AR) **
> >>
> >> The si_addr ought to be 0x7f6568000000 - the vaddr of the first page
> >> in this case.
> >
> > The failure came from here :
> >
> > [PATCH RESEND v6 6/9] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS
> >
> > +static int
> > +xfs_dax_notify_failure(
> > ...
> > + if (!xfs_sb_version_hasrmapbt(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > + xfs_warn(mp, "notify_failure() needs rmapbt enabled!");
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> >
> > I am not familiar with XFS, but I have a few questions I hope to get
> > answers -
> >
> > 1) What does it take and cost to make
> > xfs_sb_version_hasrmapbt(&mp->m_sb) to return true?
Enable rmpabt feature when making xfs filesystem
`mkfs.xfs -m rmapbt=1 /path/to/device`
BTW, reflink is enabled by default.
> >
> > 2) For a running environment that fails the above check, is it
> > okay to leave the poison handle in limbo and why?
It will fall back to the old handler. I think you have already known it.
> >
> > 3) If the above regression is not acceptable, any potential remedy?
>
> How about moving the check to prior to the notifier registration?
> And register only if the check is passed? This seems better than an
> alternative which is to fall back to the legacy memory_failure handling in case
> the filesystem returns -EOPNOTSUPP.
Sounds like a nice solution. I think I can add an is_notify_supported() interface in dax_holder_ops and check it when register dax_holder.
--
Thanks,
Ruan.
>
> thanks,
> -jane
>
> >
> > thanks!
> > -jane
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Something is not right...
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> -jane
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/5/2021 6:17 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
> >>> The filesystem part of the pmem failure handling is at minimum built
> >>> on PAGE_SIZE granularity - an inheritance from general
> >>> memory_failure handling. However, with Intel's DCPMEM technology,
> >>> the error blast radius is no more than 256bytes, and might get
> >>> smaller with future hardware generation, also advanced atomic 64B write
> to clear the poison.
> >>> But I don't see any of that could be incorporated in, given that the
> >>> filesystem is notified a corruption with pfn, rather than an exact
> >>> address.
> >>>
> >>> So I guess this question is also for Dan: how to avoid unnecessarily
> >>> repairing a PMD range for a 256B corrupt range going forward?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> -jane
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/30/2021 3:01 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> >>>> When memory-failure occurs, we call this function which is
> >>>> implemented by each kind of devices. For the fsdax case, pmem
> >>>> device driver implements it. Pmem device driver will find out the
> >>>> filesystem in which the corrupted page located in. And finally
> >>>> call filesystem handler to deal with this error.
> >>>>
> >>>> The filesystem will try to recover the corrupted data if necessary.
> >>>
> >>
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 10:01 [PATCH RESEND v6 0/9] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Shiyang Ruan
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure() Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 1:17 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-16 17:20 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-17 1:44 ` ruansy.fnst
2021-08-18 5:43 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-18 6:08 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-18 7:52 ` ruansy.fnst [this message]
2021-08-18 17:10 ` Dan Williams
2021-08-23 13:21 ` hch
2021-08-18 15:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-19 7:18 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-19 8:11 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-19 9:10 ` ruansy.fnst
2021-08-19 20:50 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-20 16:07 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 2/9] dax: Introduce holder for dax_device Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 1:02 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-17 1:45 ` ruansy.fnst
2021-08-20 16:06 ` Dan Williams
2021-08-20 20:19 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 3/9] mm: factor helpers for memory_failure_dev_pagemap Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 1:00 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-20 16:54 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 4/9] pmem,mm: Implement ->memory_failure in pmem driver Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-20 20:51 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 5/9] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 0:59 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-20 22:40 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 6/9] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 0:50 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-20 22:56 ` Dan Williams
2021-08-20 22:59 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 7/9] dm: Introduce ->rmap() to find bdev offset Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-20 23:46 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 8/9] md: Implement dax_holder_operations Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 0:48 ` Jane Chu
2021-08-17 1:59 ` ruansy.fnst
2021-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 9/9] fsdax: add exception for reflinked files Shiyang Ruan
2021-08-06 0:46 ` Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OSBPR01MB2920AD0C7FD02E238D0C387AF4FF9@OSBPR01MB2920.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).