From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81749C43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA38E204EC for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=xenosoft.de header.i=@xenosoft.de header.b="lwdmIs4S" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA38E204EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenosoft.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BP1h3Wf6zF3yH for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:19:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.helo=mo6-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de (client-ip=2a01:238:20a:202:5302::9; helo=mo6-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de; envelope-from=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenosoft.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=xenosoft.de header.i=@xenosoft.de header.b="lwdmIs4S"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mo6-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5302::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BNzH2LRCzF3jr for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:17:46 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1573460259; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=xenosoft.de; h=In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:References:Cc:To:From:Subject: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=I34eY/Xc9cf0a6K3KuyVWJGfAFrDKl9f+FC20iCE5jc=; b=lwdmIs4Sv6umRPRNtSpo0oNzSoq55f8lsmgBHOPjo16xlj12CU310obe5Bycw/Goy6 Ytvt34gFLJturiebHCctNkcN/XgTrRjyOccs9ekeaLW/vZlqVJrpoktFqbZIuxCfTZiQ IY2l9A0hY2PnbHGLmj6XGW+L2I4Hps/CGlUZwH2a65CWjA9pDlX6gfqrkYhXXbkH7qN0 rz0V+LvBVLIg+WWNtN1916X8H5u8IJ80iM/DbAnf7k/isYiGLvDvsGZJdX4Vdvwtr0xz PPE4bXYfzI51Lk5blrP6SHcZ/l3aRsQtX1GVBapPRh/3d+XY0J6XcgqwOVih/uqSbnN9 xO4g== X-RZG-AUTH: ":L2QefEenb+UdBJSdRCXu93KJ1bmSGnhMdmOod1DhGM4l4Hio94KKxRySd+h5FvloCRpQViBsLQ==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [192.168.178.47] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.29.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id q007c8vAB8GtS7D (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:16:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - overflow of DMA mask and bus mask From: Christian Zigotzky To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20181213112511.GA4574@lst.de> <008c981e-bdd2-21a7-f5f7-c57e4850ae9a@xenosoft.de> <20190103073622.GA24323@lst.de> <71A251A5-FA06-4019-B324-7AED32F7B714@xenosoft.de> <1b0c5c21-2761-d3a3-651b-3687bb6ae694@xenosoft.de> <3504ee70-02de-049e-6402-2d530bf55a84@xenosoft.de> <46025f1b-db20-ac23-7dcd-10bc43bbb6ee@xenosoft.de> <20191105162856.GA15402@lst.de> <2f3c81bd-d498-066a-12c0-0a7715cda18f@xenosoft.de> Message-ID: <0c5a8009-d28b-601f-3d1a-9de0e869911c@xenosoft.de> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:16:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: de-DE X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net, mad skateman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , paulus@samba.org, rtd2@xtra.co.nz, "contact@a-eon.com" , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11 November 2019 at 09:12 am, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > On 10 November 2019 at 08:27 am, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >> On 07 November 2019 at 10:53 am, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >>> On 05 November 2019 at 05:28 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:56:27AM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> We still have DMA problems with some PCI devices. Since the >>>>> PowerPC updates >>>>> 4.21-1 [1] we need to decrease the RAM to 3500MB (mem=3500M) if we >>>>> want to >>>>> work with our PCI devices. The FSL P5020 and P5040 have these >>>>> problems >>>>> currently. >>>>> >>>>> Error message: >>>>> >>>>> [   25.654852] bttv 1000:04:05.0: overflow 0x00000000fe077000+4096 >>>>> of DMA >>>>> mask ffffffff bus mask df000000 >>>>> >>>>> All 5.x Linux kernels can't initialize a SCSI PCI card anymore so >>>>> booting >>>>> of a Linux userland isn't possible. >>>>> >>>>> PLEASE check the DMA changes in the PowerPC updates 4.21-1 [1]. >>>>> The kernel >>>>> 4.20 works with all PCI devices without limitation of RAM. >>>> Can you send me the .config and a dmesg?  And in the meantime try the >>>> patch below? >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >From 4d659b7311bd4141fdd3eeeb80fa2d7602ea01d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 >>>> 2001 >>>> From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne >>>> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:00:43 +0200 >>>> Subject: dma-direct: check for overflows on 32 bit DMA addresses >>>> >>>> As seen on the new Raspberry Pi 4 and sta2x11's DMA implementation >>>> it is >>>> possible for a device configured with 32 bit DMA addresses and a >>>> partial >>>> DMA mapping located at the end of the address space to overflow. It >>>> happens when a higher physical address, not DMAable, is translated to >>>> it's DMA counterpart. >>>> >>>> For example the Raspberry Pi 4, configurable up to 4 GB of memory, has >>>> an interconnect capable of addressing the lower 1 GB of physical >>>> memory >>>> with a DMA offset of 0xc0000000. It transpires that, any attempt to >>>> translate physical addresses higher than the first GB will result >>>> in an >>>> overflow which dma_capable() can't detect as it only checks for >>>> addresses bigger then the maximum allowed DMA address. >>>> >>>> Fix this by verifying in dma_capable() if the DMA address range >>>> provided >>>> is at any point lower than the minimum possible DMA address on the >>>> bus. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne >>>> --- >>>>   include/linux/dma-direct.h | 8 ++++++++ >>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h >>>> index adf993a3bd58..6ad9e9ea7564 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h >>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >>>>   #define _LINUX_DMA_DIRECT_H 1 >>>>     #include >>>> +#include /* for min_low_pfn */ >>>>   #include >>>>     #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA >>>> @@ -27,6 +28,13 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device >>>> *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) >>>>       if (!dev->dma_mask) >>>>           return false; >>>>   +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT >>>> +    /* Check if DMA address overflowed */ >>>> +    if (min(addr, addr + size - 1) < >>>> +        __phys_to_dma(dev, (phys_addr_t)(min_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))) >>>> +        return false; >>>> +#endif >>>> + >>>>       return addr + size - 1 <= >>>>           min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask); >>>>   } >>> Hello Christoph, >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your patch! Unfortunately this patch doesn't solve >>> the issue. >>> >>> Error messages: >>> >>> [    6.041163] bttv: driver version 0.9.19 loaded >>> [    6.041167] bttv: using 8 buffers with 2080k (520 pages) each for >>> capture >>> [    6.041559] bttv: Bt8xx card found (0) >>> [    6.041609] bttv: 0: Bt878 (rev 17) at 1000:04:05.0, irq: 19, >>> latency: 128, mmio: 0xc20001000 >>> [    6.041622] bttv: 0: using: Typhoon TView RDS + FM Stereo / KNC1 >>> TV Station RDS [card=53,insmod option] >>> [    6.042216] bttv: 0: tuner type=5 >>> [    6.111994] bttv: 0: audio absent, no audio device found! >>> [    6.176425] bttv: 0: Setting PLL: 28636363 => 35468950 (needs up >>> to 100ms) >>> [    6.200005] bttv: PLL set ok >>> [    6.209351] bttv: 0: registered device video0 >>> [    6.211576] bttv: 0: registered device vbi0 >>> [    6.214897] bttv: 0: registered device radio0 >>> [  114.218806] bttv 1000:04:05.0: overflow 0x00000000ff507000+4096 >>> of DMA mask ffffffff bus mask df000000 >>> [  114.218848] Modules linked in: rfcomm bnep tuner_simple >>> tuner_types tea5767 tuner tda7432 tvaudio msp3400 bttv tea575x >>> tveeprom videobuf_dma_sg videobuf_core rc_core videodev mc btusb >>> btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth uio_pdrv_genirq uio ecdh_generic ecc >>> [  114.219012] [c0000001ecddf720] [80000000008ff6e8] >>> .buffer_prepare+0x150/0x268 [bttv] >>> [  114.219029] [c0000001ecddf860] [80000000008fff6c] >>> .bttv_qbuf+0x50/0x64 [bttv] >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Trace: >>> >>> [  462.783184] Call Trace: >>> [  462.783187] [c0000001c6c67420] [c0000000000b3358] >>> .report_addr+0xb8/0xc0 (unreliable) >>> [  462.783192] [c0000001c6c67490] [c0000000000b351c] >>> .dma_direct_map_page+0xf0/0x128 >>> [  462.783195] [c0000001c6c67530] [c0000000000b35b0] >>> .dma_direct_map_sg+0x5c/0xac >>> [  462.783205] [c0000001c6c675e0] [8000000000862e88] >>> .__videobuf_iolock+0x660/0x6d8 [videobuf_dma_sg] >>> [  462.783220] [c0000001c6c676b0] [8000000000854274] >>> .videobuf_iolock+0x98/0xb4 [videobuf_core] >>> [  462.783271] [c0000001c6c67720] [80000000008686e8] >>> .buffer_prepare+0x150/0x268 [bttv] >>> [  462.783276] [c0000001c6c677c0] [8000000000854afc] >>> .videobuf_qbuf+0x2b8/0x428 [videobuf_core] >>> [  462.783288] [c0000001c6c67860] [8000000000868f6c] >>> .bttv_qbuf+0x50/0x64 [bttv] >>> [  462.783383] [c0000001c6c678e0] [80000000007bf208] >>> .v4l_qbuf+0x54/0x60 [videodev] >>> [  462.783402] [c0000001c6c67970] [80000000007c1eac] >>> .__video_do_ioctl+0x30c/0x3f8 [videodev] >>> [  462.783421] [c0000001c6c67a80] [80000000007c3c08] >>> .video_usercopy+0x18c/0x3dc [videodev] >>> [  462.783440] [c0000001c6c67c00] [80000000007bb14c] >>> .v4l2_ioctl+0x60/0x78 [videodev] >>> [  462.783460] [c0000001c6c67c90] [80000000007d3c48] >>> .v4l2_compat_ioctl32+0x9b4/0x1850 [videodev] >>> [  462.783468] [c0000001c6c67d70] [c0000000001ad9cc] >>> .__se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x284/0x127c >>> [  462.783473] [c0000001c6c67e20] [c00000000000067c] >>> system_call+0x60/0x6c >>> [  462.783475] Instruction dump: >>> [  462.783477] 40fe0044 60000000 892255d0 2f890000 40fe0020 3c82ffc5 >>> 39200001 60000000 >>> [  462.783483] 38842029 992255d0 485ad0d9 60000000 <0fe00000> >>> 38210070 e8010010 7c0803a6 >>> [  462.783490] ---[ end trace b677d4a00458e277 ]--- >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> dmesg fsl p5040: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285813 >>> >>> Kernel 5.4-rc6 config for the Cyrus+ board and for the QEMU ppce500 >>> board (CPU: P5040 and P5020): >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285815 >>> >>> Bug report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205201 >>> >>> Thanks for your help, >>> >>> Christian >> >> Christoph, >> >> Do you have another patch for testing or shall I bisect? >> >> Thanks, >> Christian > > Hi Christoph, > > I have seen that I have activated the kernel config option > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. That means your code in your patch won't > work if this kernel option is enabled. > > +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > +    /* Check if DMA address overflowed */ > +    if (min(addr, addr + size - 1) < > +        __phys_to_dma(dev, (phys_addr_t)(min_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))) > +        return false; > +#endif > > I will delete the lines with ifndef and endif and will try it again. > > Cheers, > Christian Christoph, I have seen that the patch above isn't from you. It's from Nicolas Saenz Julienne. Cheers, Christian