linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ppaidipe <ppaidipe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/perf: Fix memory allocation for core-imc based on num_possible_cpus()
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:18:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0df1478ff69b9e2f2c70897a472ada39@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526452518-12611-1-git-send-email-anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 2018-05-16 12:05, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> Currently memory is allocated for core-imc based on cpu_present_mask,
> which has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populated. We use (cpu number / 
> threads
> per core) as the array index to access the memory.
> 
> Under some circumstances firmware marks a CPU as GUARDed CPU and boot 
> the
> system, until cleared of errors, these CPU's are unavailable for all
> subsequent boots. GUARDed CPUs are possible but not present from linux
> view, so it blows a hole when we assume the max length of our 
> allocation
> is driven by our max present cpus, where as one of the cpus might be 
> online
> and be beyond the max present cpus, due to the hole.
> So (cpu number / threads per core) value bounds the array index and 
> leads
> to memory overflow.
> 
> Call trace observed during a guard test:
> 
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000149f1c
> cpu 0x69: Vector: 380 (Data Access Out of Range) at [c000003fea303420]
>     pc:c000000000149f1c: prefetch_freepointer+0x14/0x30
>     lr:c00000000014e0f8: __kmalloc+0x1a8/0x1ac
>     sp:c000003fea3036a0
>    msr:9000000000009033
>    dar:c9c54b2c91dbf6b7
>   current = 0xc000003fea2c0000
>   paca    = 0xc00000000fddd880	 softe: 3	 irq_happened: 0x01
>     pid   = 1, comm = swapper/104
> Linux version 4.16.7-openpower1 (smc@smc-desktop) (gcc version 6.4.0
> (Buildroot 2018.02.1-00006-ga8d1126)) #2 SMP Fri May 4 16:44:54 PDT 
> 2018
> enter ? for help
> call trace:
> 	 __kmalloc+0x1a8/0x1ac
> 	 (unreliable)
> 	 init_imc_pmu+0x7f4/0xbf0
> 	 opal_imc_counters_probe+0x3fc/0x43c
> 	 platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x80
> 	 driver_probe_device+0x22c/0x308
> 	 __driver_attach+0xa0/0xd8
> 	 bus_for_each_dev+0x88/0xb4
> 	 driver_attach+0x2c/0x40
> 	 bus_add_driver+0x1e8/0x228
> 	 driver_register+0xd0/0x114
> 	 __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64
> 	 opal_imc_driver_init+0x24/0x38
> 	 do_one_initcall+0x150/0x15c
> 	 kernel_init_freeable+0x250/0x254
> 	 kernel_init+0x1c/0x150
> 	 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0xc8
> 
> Allocating memory for core-imc based on cpu_possible_mask, which has
> bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable, will fix this issue.
> 
> Reported-by: Pridhiviraj Paidipeddi <ppaidipe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>

I have verified this fix with both normal and kexec boot multiple times 
when
system is having GARDed cores. Not seen any crash/memory corruption 
issues with
this.

Tested-by: Pridhiviraj Paidipeddi <ppaidipe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


> ---
>  arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
> index d7532e7..75fb23c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static int init_nest_pmu_ref(void)
> 
>  static void cleanup_all_core_imc_memory(void)
>  {
> -	int i, nr_cores = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_present_cpus(), threads_per_core);
> +	int i, nr_cores = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_possible_cpus(), 
> threads_per_core);
>  	struct imc_mem_info *ptr = core_imc_pmu->mem_info;
>  	int size = core_imc_pmu->counter_mem_size;
> 
> @@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ static int imc_mem_init(struct imc_pmu *pmu_ptr,
> struct device_node *parent,
>  		if (!pmu_ptr->pmu.name)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> 
> -		nr_cores = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_present_cpus(), threads_per_core);
> +		nr_cores = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_possible_cpus(), threads_per_core);
>  		pmu_ptr->mem_info = kcalloc(nr_cores, sizeof(struct imc_mem_info),
>  								GFP_KERNEL);

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16  6:35 [PATCH v2] powerpc/perf: Fix memory allocation for core-imc based on num_possible_cpus() Anju T Sudhakar
2018-05-16  6:48 ` ppaidipe [this message]
2018-05-16  6:46   ` Anju T Sudhakar
2018-05-21 10:01 ` [v2] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0df1478ff69b9e2f2c70897a472ada39@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ppaidipe@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).