linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: tklein@de.ibm.com, tinytim@us.ibm.com, jeff@garzik.org,
	themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jean-pierre.dion@bull.net,
	sebastien.dugue@bull.net, raisch@de.ibm.com,
	gilles.carry@ext.bull.net
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ehea: fix mutex and spinlock use
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:34:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221140080-9853-3-git-send-email-sebastien.dugue@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1221140080-9853-1-git-send-email-sebastien.dugue@bull.net>

  Looks like to me that the ehea_fw_handles.lock mutex and the
ehea_bcmc_regs.lock spinlock are taken much longer than necessary and could
as well be pushed inside the functions that need them
(ehea_update_firmware_handles() and ehea_update_bcmc_registrations())
rather than at each callsite.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
---
 drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |   26 ++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
index b70c531..c765ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
@@ -219,9 +219,11 @@ static void ehea_update_firmware_handles(void)
 	}
 
 out_update:
+	mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 	kfree(ehea_fw_handles.arr);
 	ehea_fw_handles.arr = arr;
 	ehea_fw_handles.num_entries = i;
+	mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 }
 
 static void ehea_update_bcmc_registrations(void)
@@ -293,9 +295,11 @@ static void ehea_update_bcmc_registrations(void)
 	}
 
 out_update:
+	spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 	kfree(ehea_bcmc_regs.arr);
 	ehea_bcmc_regs.arr = arr;
 	ehea_bcmc_regs.num_entries = i;
+	spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 }
 
 static struct net_device_stats *ehea_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -1770,8 +1774,6 @@ static int ehea_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *sa)
 
 	memcpy(dev->dev_addr, mac_addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
 
-	spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
 	/* Deregister old MAC in pHYP */
 	if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_UP) {
 		ret = ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC);
@@ -1792,7 +1794,6 @@ static int ehea_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *sa)
 
 out_upregs:
 	ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
-	spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 out_free:
 	kfree(cb0);
 out:
@@ -1954,8 +1955,6 @@ static void ehea_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
 	}
 	ehea_promiscuous(dev, 0);
 
-	spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
 	if (dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) {
 		ehea_allmulti(dev, 1);
 		goto out;
@@ -1985,7 +1984,6 @@ static void ehea_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
 	}
 out:
 	ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
-	spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 	return;
 }
 
@@ -2466,8 +2464,6 @@ static int ehea_up(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_UP)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
 	ret = ehea_port_res_setup(port, port->num_def_qps,
 				  port->num_add_tx_qps);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -2504,8 +2500,6 @@ static int ehea_up(struct net_device *dev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
 	ret = ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_REG_BCMC);
 	if (ret) {
 		ret = -EIO;
@@ -2527,10 +2521,8 @@ out:
 		ehea_info("Failed starting %s. ret=%i", dev->name, ret);
 
 	ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
-	spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 
 	ehea_update_firmware_handles();
-	mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2580,9 +2572,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_DOWN)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
-	spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 	ehea_drop_multicast_list(dev);
 	ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC);
 
@@ -2591,7 +2580,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
 	port->state = EHEA_PORT_DOWN;
 
 	ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
-	spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
 
 	ret = ehea_clean_all_portres(port);
 	if (ret)
@@ -2599,7 +2587,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
 			  dev->name, ret);
 
 	ehea_update_firmware_handles();
-	mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3378,7 +3365,6 @@ static int __devinit ehea_probe_adapter(struct of_device *dev,
 		ehea_error("Invalid ibmebus device probed");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 
 	adapter = kzalloc(sizeof(*adapter), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!adapter) {
@@ -3462,7 +3448,6 @@ out_free_ad:
 
 out:
 	ehea_update_firmware_handles();
-	mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -3481,8 +3466,6 @@ static int __devexit ehea_remove(struct of_device *dev)
 
 	flush_scheduled_work();
 
-	mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
 	ibmebus_free_irq(adapter->neq->attr.ist1, adapter);
 	tasklet_kill(&adapter->neq_tasklet);
 
@@ -3492,7 +3475,6 @@ static int __devexit ehea_remove(struct of_device *dev)
 	kfree(adapter);
 
 	ehea_update_firmware_handles();
-	mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.6.0.1.308.gede4c

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-11 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-11 13:34 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc - EHEA fixes Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-11 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix phyp debugging typo Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-13 19:12   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-09-11 13:34 ` Sebastien Dugue [this message]
2008-09-13 19:30   ` [PATCH 2/2] ehea: fix mutex and spinlock use Jeff Garzik
2008-09-15 15:18   ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-16  6:57     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-16  9:13       ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-16 10:38         ` Sebastien Dugue
2010-04-19 12:08       ` [PATCH 2/2] ehea: fix possible DLPAR/mem deadlock Thomas Klein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1221140080-9853-3-git-send-email-sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
    --to=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
    --cc=gilles.carry@ext.bull.net \
    --cc=jean-pierre.dion@bull.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=themann@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tinytim@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tklein@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).