From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387A4DDF8A for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:58:31 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Problems with PCI-E devices not being detected with switch From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stefan Roese In-Reply-To: <200810161048.45937.sr@denx.de> References: <16691A8B34B5D9458EA3A1C37A11555A0137F81E@tanisys-ex2.Tanisys.Local> <200810161003.31801.sr@denx.de> <1224145785.7654.4.camel@pasglop> <200810161048.45937.sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:58:18 +1100 Message-Id: <1224147498.7654.8.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Ayman El-Khashab , Victor Gallardo , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 10:48 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > Yeah. I could add this "configured" property to the current U-Boot version. > Perhaps we should add some version information to it so that Linux could > eventually decide to re-configure when the "configured" version is known to > be buggy. What do you think? I'd rather have the platform have a way to override it rather than having tests for uboot versions in the pci code itself. Ben.