From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8031007D1
	for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>;
	Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:35:26 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/19] powerpc: gamecube: platform support
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <BBB65A84-B871-474F-8666-90CCD10D90B6@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <1258927311-4340-1-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-2-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-3-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-4-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-5-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-6-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-7-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-8-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-9-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-10-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-11-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-12-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<1258927311-4340-13-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
	<F5450BB0-FBBB-48D5-A054-CB147FD43EAA@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4B0D6837.4020407@yahoo.es>
	<76CF44C1-3CC1-43B5-958D-E1A7984A44A9@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4B0EFC1D.5030806@yahoo.es>
	<BBB65A84-B871-474F-8666-90CCD10D90B6@kernel.crashing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:35:18 +1100
Message-ID: <1259357718.2076.7.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 01:09 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> We need it as it currently doesn't match with the default bus ids.
> >>
> >>> Should I introduce a .type property matching any of those above  
> >>> in the
> >>> soc node, and get rid of the explicit bus probe?
> >>
> >> You don't need any fake bus as far as I can see, just probe the  
> >> devices
> >> you want.
> >
> > But it's way easier to let the bus probe do it for us. I don't see  
> > the win here.
> 
> As long as this doesn't leak into the device tree in any way, I don't
> care.  How's that? :-)

I still like having the node that encloses all the devices. Not sure
why, but I like it :-)

Cheers,
Ben.