linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [GITPULL+PATCH 0/2] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip.
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:44:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268387091.10129.5973.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)

This small series ensures that struct irq_desc->chip_data is available
for alternative irq_chip implementations.

There is an outstanding issue wrt when/how the chip_data field is
initialised. I am continuing to investigate this but the solution is not
turning out as easy/low-impact as expected.

Since last time I've dropped the renaming portion of the series since it
was basically wrong, the functions I'd implicated as ioapic specific are
not at all.

Ian.

The following changes since commit 1ebbdcc83e75697c0d75eb091df172b7d93c84c1:
  Ingo Molnar (1):
        Merge branch 'perf/urgent'

are available in the git repository at:

  git://xenbits.xensource.com/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git for-x86/irq

Ian Campbell (2):
      irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip.
      x86: irq_desc->chip_data is always correct whether or not SPARSE_IRQ is enabled.

 arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c      |    2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h  |   11 ++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/uv_irq.c       |    5 +++
 include/linux/interrupt.h      |    2 +-
 include/linux/irq.h            |   12 +++++--
 kernel/irq/handle.c            |    2 +-
 kernel/irq/numa_migrate.c      |   12 ++++++-
 kernel/softirq.c               |    3 +-
 9 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2010-03-12  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-12  9:44 Ian Campbell [this message]
2010-03-12  9:45 ` [PATCH] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip Ian Campbell
2010-03-12 19:26   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-13  0:29     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-16  8:50       ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-16  9:18         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1268387091.10129.5973.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).