linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] powerpc: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:20:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285989654.2463.286.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikrgu5LrYfveax_EavObThNw2M4ukVB3ka1y0Hj@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 21:31 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > +config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > +       def_bool ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > +
> 
> I seemed to have missed what this is about entirely.  Is there some
> place I can look that describes what that is supposed to do?  The PPC
> 4xx boards set PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT because the MMU uses 36 bit
> addressing, but the CPU is only 32 bits.  I want to make sure this DMA
> thing isn't going to cause problems. 

Yes, we need to test a bit. Our dma_addr_t has remained 32-bit so far
because despite the fact that we've had routinely to deal with >32-bit
physical addresses for MMIO, physical memory support has been
constrained afaik to 32-bit.

We might be better off keeping this as something individual platforms
can select...

Cheers,
Ben.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-02  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-01 21:12 [patch 1/1] powerpc: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT akpm
2010-10-02  1:31 ` Josh Boyer
2010-10-02  3:20   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-10-02 10:11     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-10-03  6:20       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-20 22:56 akpm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285989654.2463.286.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).