From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from labridge.com (perches-mx.perches.com [206.117.179.246]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2D72C0093 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:32:40 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1352845961.17444.13.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it From: Joe Perches To: David Miller Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:32:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20121113.171736.561094209116852795.davem@davemloft.net> References: <67fe0c5701a8c7cfe06b178cf04b1c5c06592714.1352548454.git.joe@perches.com> <20121113.144406.1610017702502358739.davem@davemloft.net> <1352837845.12850.3.camel@joe-AO722> <20121113.171736.561094209116852795.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, harryxiyou@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, richard@nod.at, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, rob@landley.net, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jdike@addtoit.com, xiyoulinuxkernelgroup@googlegroups.com, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, chris@zankel.net, isdn@linux-pingi.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@zh-kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:17:25 -0800 > > > That seems an odd workflow as it leaves dangling CONFIG_ > > options set, but I guess it doesn't hurt so here it is. > > As you said it's harmless, and more importantly it avoids > unnecessary conflicts. > > > I just removed the modified arch/.../defconfig files. > > Something is not right here: > [davem@drr net-next]$ git am --signoff V2-wanrouter-Remove-it-and-the-drivers-that-depend-on-it.patch > Applying: wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: net/wanrouter/Kconfig: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: net/wanrouter/Makefile: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: net/wanrouter/patchlevel: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: net/wanrouter/wanmain.c: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: net/wanrouter/wanproc.c: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: drivers/net/wan/cycx_drv.c: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: drivers/net/wan/cycx_main.c: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.c: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: include/linux/cyclomx.h: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: include/linux/cycx_drv.h: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: include/linux/wanrouter.h: patch does not apply > error: removal patch leaves file contents > error: include/uapi/linux/wanrouter.h: patch does not apply Right, that is unexpected/odd/interesting. I was trying to save mailing list bandwidth by reducing the patch size. I generated this with $ git format-patch -M -D but it doesn't apply here either. :( Using $ git format-patch -M does apply correctly. It's quite a bit larger though. (120KB vs 14) I'll send the large patch just to netdev. Joe