linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/2] Improvement and fixes for BHRB
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:23:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370843609-32618-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

(1) The first patch fixes a situation like this

Before patch:-
------------

./perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 95 (Operation not supported) for event (branch-misses:k).
/bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?

Here 'perf record' actually copies over ':k' filter request into BHRB
privilege state filter config and our previous check in kernel would
fail that.

After patch:-
-------------

/perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls
perf  perf.data  perf.data.old  test-mmap-ring
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (~102 samples) ]

(2) The second patch fixes context migration for BHRB filter configuration

Changes in V2
-------------
(1) Updated the comment section of the code
(2) Removed the informational print
(3) Updated the commit section of the first patch

Changes in V3
-------------
(1) Fixed the compilation warning problem after removing the unused variable

Anshuman Khandual (2):
  powerpc, perf: Ignore separate BHRB privilege state filter request
  powerpc, perf: BHRB filter configuration should follow the task

 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c |  5 ++++-
 arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c  | 13 ++++---------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.11.7

             reply	other threads:[~2013-06-10  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10  5:53 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2013-06-10  5:53 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] powerpc, perf: Ignore separate BHRB privilege state filter request Anshuman Khandual
2013-06-24  7:19   ` Michael Neuling
2013-06-10  5:53 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] powerpc, perf: BHRB filter configuration should follow the task Anshuman Khandual
2013-06-24  7:20   ` Michael Neuling
2013-07-22  6:39     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-07-22  6:48       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-23 13:20         ` Michael Ellerman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-10  5:25 [PATCH V3 0/2] Improvement and fixes for BHRB Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370843609-32618-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).