linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 21/21] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:10:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409911806-10519-22-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409911806-10519-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

Now we use struct msi_chip in all platforms to configure
MSI/MSI-X. We can clean up the unused arch functions.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c |    2 +-
 drivers/pci/msi.c             |   99 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 include/linux/msi.h           |   14 ------
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
index 99b1c0f..6e645f0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ error:
 
 	/*
 	 * Restore altered MSI descriptor fields and prevent just destroyed
-	 * IRQs from tearing down again in default_teardown_msi_irqs()
+	 * IRQs from tearing down again in teardown_msi_irqs()
 	 */
 	msidesc->irq = 0;
 	msidesc->nvec_used = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index d78d637..e3e7f4f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -34,50 +34,31 @@ struct msi_chip * __weak arch_find_msi_chip(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	return dev->bus->msi;
 }
 
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc)
-{
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
-	int err;
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	err = chip->setup_irq(dev, desc);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return err;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct msi_chip *chip = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
-		return;
-
-	chip->teardown_irq(irq);
-}
-
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
+int setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
 	int ret;
 	struct msi_chip *chip;
 
 	chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
-	if (chip && chip->setup_irqs)
+	if (!chip)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (chip->setup_irqs)
 		return chip->setup_irqs(dev, nvec, type);
 
 	/*
 	 * If an architecture wants to support multiple MSI, it needs to
-	 * override arch_setup_msi_irqs()
+	 * implement chip->setup_irqs().
 	 */
 	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!chip->setup_irq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
-		ret = arch_setup_msi_irq(dev, entry);
+		ret = chip->setup_irq(dev, entry);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 		if (ret > 0)
@@ -87,13 +68,20 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * We have a default implementation available as a separate non-weak
- * function, as it is used by the Xen x86 PCI code
- */
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
+	struct msi_chip *chip;
+
+	chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
+	if (!chip)
+		return;
+
+	if (chip->teardown_irqs)
+		return chip->teardown_irqs(dev);
+
+	if (!chip->teardown_irq)
+		return;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		int i, nvec;
@@ -104,20 +92,10 @@ void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		else
 			nvec = 1 << entry->msi_attrib.multiple;
 		for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
-			arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq + i);
+			chip->teardown_irq(entry->irq + i);
 	}
 }
 
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
-
-	if (chip && chip->teardown_irqs)
-		return chip->teardown_irqs(dev);
-
-	return default_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
-}
-
 static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
@@ -136,10 +114,18 @@ static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
 		write_msi_msg(irq, &entry->msg);
 }
 
-void __weak arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
+	struct msi_desc *entry = NULL;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
+		default_restore_msi_irq(dev, entry->irq);
+	}
+}
 
+static void restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_find_msi_chip(dev);
 	if (chip && chip->restore_irqs)
 		return chip->restore_irqs(dev);
 
@@ -248,15 +234,6 @@ void unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *data)
 	msi_set_mask_bit(data, 0);
 }
 
-void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	struct msi_desc *entry;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
-		default_restore_msi_irq(dev, entry->irq);
-	}
-}
-
 void read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	BUG_ON(entry->dev->current_state != PCI_D0);
@@ -360,7 +337,7 @@ static void free_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 			BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i));
 	}
 
-	arch_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
+	teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
@@ -430,7 +407,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msi_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
-	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+	restore_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control);
 	msi_mask_irq(entry, msi_mask(entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap),
@@ -453,7 +430,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, 0,
 				PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
 
-	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+	restore_msi_irqs(dev);
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked);
 	}
@@ -624,7 +601,7 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
 	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
 
 	/* Configure MSI capability structure */
-	ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
+	ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
 	if (ret) {
 		msi_mask_irq(entry, mask, ~mask);
 		free_msi_irqs(dev);
@@ -740,7 +717,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
+	ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_avail;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 92a51e7..d6e1f7c 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -51,20 +51,6 @@ struct msi_desc {
 	struct kobject kobj;
 };
 
-/*
- * The arch hooks to setup up msi irqs. Those functions are
- * implemented as weak symbols so that they /can/ be overriden by
- * architecture specific code if needed.
- */
-int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc);
-void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
-int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type);
-void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
-void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
-
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
-void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
-
 struct msi_chip {
 	struct module *owner;
 	struct device *dev;
-- 
1.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-05  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-05 10:09 [PATCH v1 00/21] Use MSI chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 01/21] PCI/MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 02/21] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 03/21] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:00   ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16  1:30     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-16 10:29       ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 10:37         ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 04/21] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-09-10 12:36   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-11  1:22     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-11 13:08       ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/21] PCI/MSI: Introduce weak arch_find_msi_chip() to find MSI chip Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:42   ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16  2:08     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 06/21] PCI/MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to make it become more common Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:44   ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16  2:09     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 07/21] x86/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 08/21] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 14:29   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-09  2:06     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-10 12:38       ` David Vrabel
2014-09-10 14:59         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-11  1:28           ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-11  1:27         ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 09/21] Irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:42   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-05 11:30     ` wangyijing
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 10/21] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 11/21] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/21] MIPS/Xlp: Remove the dead function destroy_irq() to fix build error Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 13/21] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 14/21] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:47   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-05 11:33     ` wangyijing
2014-09-05 11:41       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-16  5:28   ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-16  5:40     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 16/21] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-16 11:35   ` Sebastian Ott
2014-09-17  1:24     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 17/21] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 18/21] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 19/21] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 20/21] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-09-15 14:47   ` [PATCH v1 21/21] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Lucas Stach
2014-09-16  2:09     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v1 00/21] Use MSI chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-24  3:52   ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1409911806-10519-22-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).