From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Liberman Igal-B31950 <Igal.Liberman@freescale.com>,
Bucur Madalin-Cristian-B32716 <madalin.bucur@freescale.com>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] clk: qoriq: Move chip-specific knowledge into driver
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:43:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439621017.15601.23.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811182535.31346.52965@quantum>
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 11:25 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Quoting Scott Wood (2015-06-18 19:49:10)
> > The existing device tree bindings are error-prone and inflexible.
> > Correct the mistake by moving the knowledge into the driver, which
> > has more flexibility in describing the quirks of each chip. This leaves
> > the device tree to its proper role of identifying a programming interface
> > rather than describing its individual registers.
>
> Sorry for not responding to this one sooner. Fell through the cracks.
>
> All of the changes to drives/clk/clk-qoriq.c look great to me. I assume
> you need to keep all of these patches together and want to the take
> through the freescale tree? If so feel free to add,
>
> Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
I just sent a non-RFC v2, with improved compatibility with old device trees
(especially ls1021a). It depends on the cpufreq patch though (at least, to
avoid breaking qoriq-cpufreq until that patch is merged), so I'll also need
an ack from Rafael for that if I'm taking it through my tree.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-15 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 2:49 [RFC PATCH 0/8] clk: qoriq: Move chip-specific knowledge into driver Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] ARM: dts: ls1021a: Fix clockgen node Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] cpufreq: qoriq: Don't look at clock implementation details Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] powerpc/fsl: Move fsl_guts.h out of arch/powerpc Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] clk: qoriq: Move chip-specific knowledge into driver Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] clk: qoriq: Redirect legacy clock nodes to new clocks Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] cpufreq: qoriq: Remove frequency masking and minimum Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] clk: qoriq: Expose OF clocks directly from the clockgen node Scott Wood
2015-06-19 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] powerpc/fsl: Use new clockgen binding Scott Wood
2015-07-30 15:32 ` Liberman Igal
2015-08-11 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] clk: qoriq: Move chip-specific knowledge into driver Michael Turquette
2015-08-15 6:43 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-10-02 0:23 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-02 0:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-09 23:57 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-22 10:11 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439621017.15601.23.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=Igal.Liberman@freescale.com \
--cc=Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madalin.bucur@freescale.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).