From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qZhdT09zpzDqfS for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:08:29 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1459328908.23987.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: mailman From rewriting [was perf jit: genelf makes assumptions about endian] From: Michael Ellerman To: Jeremy Kerr , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Anton Blanchard , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:08:28 +1100 In-Reply-To: <56FB6464.4010609@ozlabs.org> References: <20160329175944.33a211cc@kryten> <56FA435A.5010804@ozlabs.org> <20160329210639.12136fd5@canb.auug.org.au> <56FB6464.4010609@ozlabs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:30 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > > Do you know why mailman would be re-writing From: there? It's confusing > > > patchwork, as multiple mails are now coming from that address. > > > > Yep, Anton posts from samba.org. They publish a DMARC policy that > > breaks mailing lists. > > (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━━┻ > > This also breaks git-am: > > [jk@pudge linux]$ git am incoming.eml > Applying: perf jit: genelf makes assumptions about endian > [jk@pudge linux]$ git log --format='format:%an <%ae>' -1 > Anton Blanchard via Linuxppc-dev Actually one thing that makes this less of a problem, is that if you get the mail directly then the From is fine. ie. for this patch I was on Cc, so the list didn't send me a copy, I just got it straight from Anton. So if I was wanting to git-am this mail I'd be fine. Not saying that's a solution, but it's something. cheers